It's The New York Times that should not be trusted

The Post Chronicle ^ | 12/21/05 | Michael J. Gaynor

[RepublicNewbie]

Did The New York Times deliberately disclose important classified information that it never should have acquired (and had properly kept confidential for a year), at a propitious time to distract from the immense success of the December 15, 2005 Iraqi election and to bolster the chance that the far left minority in the United States Senate might successfully filibuster the renewal of important provisions of The Patriot Act set to expire at the end of the year, and disclose that important classified information in such a way as to suggest that President Bush was irresponsibly abusing his executive power and should be impeached for it instead of doing precisely what he should be doing as a wartime President to protect America from more terrorist attacks and should be supported?

Yes.

Was it mere coincidence, or childish mischief, or monumental malevolence?

Think about it.

[manwiththehands]

Punctuation is our friend.

[RayChuang88]

I wouldn't be surprised that the New York Times offices get raided by the FBI, Secret Service and US Marshals within the next week or so.