To: truthfinder9
I have a real hard spot believing anyone that begins his (or her) arguements with the term "fundy" ...
Whether sarchasm (meanig a gaping chasm between what's said and what's intended) one side or ridicule (of the other side), it is immediately insulting.
6 posted on
12/21/2005 6:26:09 AM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Whether sarchasm [sic]
(meanig [sic]
a gaping chasm between what's said and what's intended) one side or ridicule (of the other side), it is immediately insulting.I usually agree and often admire your posts, but you lost me with this one.
The author simply uses the identical technique which is mother's milk in every pro-evolution article or critique I've ever read.
Why hold one side to a higher standard and totally ignore the contents?
36 posted on
12/21/2005 6:44:07 AM PST by
Publius6961
(The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
More insulting to you than "Merry Christmas". By the way, Merry Christmas.
165 posted on
12/21/2005 7:34:40 AM PST by
fish hawk
(creatio ex nihilo)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Whether sarchasm (meanig a gaping chasm between what's said and what's intended) one side or ridicule (of the other side), it is immediately insulting. THANK you!
I don't care WHICH side of the fence a person stands on in the evo/ID debate, trying to have a rational discussion with someone who starts out with an immature and insulting attitude is NOT *civil discourse*, IMHO!
182 posted on
12/21/2005 7:42:16 AM PST by
MamaTexan
(I am NOT a 'legal entity', nor am I a *person* as created by `law`!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson