First of all, I think we should stop for a moment and examine your operating assumptions. Your post is dripping with presuppositional contempt for the professional qualifications of those people who disagree with you. I realize that as a Darwinist there is no rational basis for according a fundamental dignity to other human beings -- they're just matter in motion, the products of an undirected, value-less process, so maybe I should not expect any more. But from the point of view of this discussion, let's just acknowledge that you're not approaching this scientifically, but dogmatically.
Secondly, you are attempt to dodge my point -- hey, that's unusual!!! -- and take the discussion in a new direction. I was countering some genius' claim that these people couldn't speak to issues of biology because they were chemists! Anyone who has any understanding of science -- to borrow a phrase -- realizes that to claim that you can't speak to biology because you are an expert in chemistry is about as stupid a statement as there is.
Maybe if I have time I'll engage you in a discussion as to why the fields of paleontology and geology have becomes as inbred as you say they have.
Being a trained paleontologist or geologist with field experience who is a creationist is like being an architect who doesn't believe in gravity; it's almost impossible to function.