[conservative in nyc]

This is Matthew Mosk's article on today's hearings on the Maryland at-will employee firings. This will drag on for at least another month. Will we learn MD4Bush's identity before then?

[conservative in nyc]

MD4Bush Ping!

Other links:
Former State Workers Describe 'Culture Of Fear' (WBAL-TV)
McCabe complained about Steffen at DHR (The Gazette)
Steffen meddled but did not fire (Washington Times)

[ikka]

Heaven forbid they lay off or terminate an overfed, underworked government agency!

[Alia]

Article: Ehrlich aides have said they view the probe as a partisan witch hunt by a Democrat-controlled legislature, exposing nothing more than the natural turnover when a new administration takes office.

Anyone who has ever worked in corporate America wherein a new boss comes in, knows this happens. Dems are complaining. Hmph. I thought they liked "eminent domain" processes. And, in this case, for the good for the governor and his administration, it is important to have a cohesive group with a shared philosophy working for him. Dems launch group-think-whine investigation. Pitiful.

[DrewsDad]

I don't understand why their is any doubt that MD4Bush is Ryan O' Doherty. They have him pegged with the email address and sending out a heads-up email before it happened.

Why look any further?

[kcvl]

[MD Senate Minority Leader (R)] Stoltzfus yesterday said he may ask the committee to subpoena records of the Web site where the chats took place, http://freerepublic.com/ , and to subpoena Washington Post reporter Matthew Mosk, who first reported the postings.

R.B. Brenner, The Post's Maryland editor, said: "There is no reason to subpoena Matthew Mosk. We have already reported that we don't know who MD4BUSH is and that the newspaper had no involvement in the postings."

Mosk was given printed copies of the messages in November 2004, Brenner said. Unable to verify their authenticity, the reporter appealed for help and, in January, was given sign-on information to enter the chat room by someone associated with MD4BUSH, he said. The exchanges with Steffen appeared in October and November.

"Given the nature of the postings, we needed to verify that the copies we had been provided were accurate," Brenner said. Mosk later showed printouts to Steffen before the Feb. 9 story was published.

Stoltzfus suggested Mosk's use of the log-in information would constitute an ethical breach if the reporter had used it to communicate with Steffen. Brenner said Mosk simply read the messages and did not post anything on the Web site.

Yeah, sure, he had nothing to do with it...

Thanks for all the info!