To: PlainOleAmerican
Has anybody read the article? What it says is that there almost certainly WERE WMDs in Iraq, but that after Jay Rockefeller tipped off Syria they were trucked out into the Bekaa Valley.
So was Bush wise to admit that intelligence on WMDs was wrong?
I don't see why this deserves a Zot, other than the silly title.
44 posted on
12/20/2005 8:36:21 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Cicero
Please. An inflammatory title in breaking news with a link that is a pop-up mess. Then the poster takes a well-timed bathroom break. Its zot-a-palooza for those a little quick on the trigger.
To: Cicero
So was Bush wise to admit that intelligence on WMDs was wrong?
There was some background noise about the Pentagon having satelite pictures of the convoys leaving the weapons sites heading into Syria in the early days of the war. I kept waiting for them to release the photos or information and it never happened.
Some reason for this might be:
The weapons are embarrassing to an ally (read Russia).
The Pentagon does not want to advertise to nefarious groups WHERE the weapons are now.
Maybe they are waiting for a very opportune time to release this information like during the 2006 election cycle.
Maybe the Administration wants to put their hands on the weapons before they reveal they exist.
88 posted on
12/20/2005 8:50:15 PM PST by
msnimje
(Political Correctness -- An OFFENSIVE attempt not to offend.)
To: Cicero
Apparently NOT!
I'm being hacked to death here by people who didn;t bother to read the column...
I thought much better then that of freepers.... until now!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson