"In fact, I have heard that there were CIA analyists who felt that Golitsyn was actually a KGB mole."
This information tells us nothing. Golitsyn claimed there were moles in the CIA. If so, of course these moles would put out this story. Either way, this story had to surface.
You and I disagree on Golitsyn. I can't "make the case" of my argument, because it hinges on a combination of things I have been reading for decades.
All I can really say is this. I have read numerous Suvorov books (GRU defector to Britain), the Pacepa book (head of Romainian KGB, defected to US, and the 2 Golitzen books.
Together, they paint a single coherent picture which I am sure is true.
Well, I suppose that the only thing we can really do in this case is wait and see what happens.