The school board in Dover Pa fraudulently claimed that ID was a scientific alternative to evolution. They actually committed perjury on the stand, lying about their intentions in adopting the ID policy. The judge used precedents in place that do not allow teaching religion in public schools.
In the 10 commandments case, the challenge was directly at the "separation of church and state" issue, and no attempt was made to lie and claim it was something else. The Supreme Court has gone off the deep end on church/state rulings over the last 60 years, and we need to remove some of that.
I note that there is no real disagreement with the ruling in the posts. That should tell those who think there is some cabal of atheists roaming FR attacking Christians in the crevo threads. I don't think any of us that oppose ID, also oppose religious life. We just want truth in science classes.