Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Killborn
You guys think we should FReep it beyond the point of viability?

Sounds good to me. Wikipedia is quickly becoming devoid of what little quality content it ever had, so there isn't anything to be lost from freeping it. Strength in numbers could also drown out the leftist stanglehold on that site, or at least provoke them into showing their true colors and discrediting themselves.

24 posted on 12/20/2005 1:33:19 PM PST by lqclamar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: lqclamar

WikiWaki is no where near a good bibliography but the lazy, incompetent, and/or agenda driven teachers ignore or even encourage the use of Wiki to subject people to BS.

A lot of urban legends are touted as facts there. The Pres.'s page is agonizing with snide innuendo and Bush bashing. All the memes are there "slow Katrina", "cronyism", "disputed election", "imminent danger", etc, etc. I used to think Wiki is pretty good, but the unemployed moonbats keep effing it up. Now I realize Wiki IS the moonbats.

I don't tolerate being tricked or lied to. I don't tolerate people telling me its good for me when its not. I don't tolerate being made a fool of. The last time that happened, I became a right-wing whacko, uberconservative patriot to the right of most Republicans and even the President himself. I don't think the libturds want to see my next incarnation.

WIKIPEDIA DELANDA EST!


35 posted on 12/20/2005 1:44:57 PM PST by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson