Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This doesn't surprise me one bit. Wikipedia is full of filthy left-wing sickos who either promote this garbage in the name of "tolerance" for homosexuals or - worse - are engaged in it themselves.

You shouldn't expect anything less though from Wikipedia, which was founded by an Internet pornography mogul and has known left-wing radicals and sexual deviants operating at the highest levels of the site's administration. Several of wikipedia's administrators are homosexual activists and one of its highest level administrators is a disgraced ex-lawyer who got disbarred by a state supreme court for soliciting prostitutes.

Any parent out there who allows their children to access Wikipedia is putting them at danger of being exposed to the very worst of internet scum.

1 posted on 12/20/2005 1:09:51 PM PST by lqclamar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: lqclamar
Who could take a publication seriously where waht will be presented as truth is voted on by poll ala American idol?
2 posted on 12/20/2005 1:12:58 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqclamar
More filth at Wikipedia - the defendant in the case at the link here is currently a top level administrator at Wikipedia.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=co&vol=1999sc%5Csc0125a&invol=1

3 posted on 12/20/2005 1:14:04 PM PST by lqclamar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqclamar

Welp, yesterday was the last day I'll use WikiWaki. Nevermore.


4 posted on 12/20/2005 1:14:43 PM PST by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqclamar

Wikipedia is a good source of information, but like most sources - one must be wary of embedded propaganda in politically sensitive topics.


5 posted on 12/20/2005 1:15:00 PM PST by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqclamar
Here is a link for it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophile

7 posted on 12/20/2005 1:17:45 PM PST by bubman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqclamar
"I would like to see child-orientated pedophiles, openly allowed to be around children, without having to keep the issue of their sexuality a secret. I would like to see the public, come to accept that such peoples are not dangerous, and that having them around children, or even trusting them with the care of a child, is not a risk. "We have a long way to go before such goals can be achieved, but I try as I may, whenever I can, to open the eyes of the ignorant on this matter, and ask for their understanding.

"I live as a GOD worshipping, child-lover, Blessed as long as I long as I put him first". But I put children second."

Scumbag. Hang him in the town square.

8 posted on 12/20/2005 1:19:56 PM PST by rattrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqclamar

Is there any reason conservatives cannot step in and also edit these?


9 posted on 12/20/2005 1:22:04 PM PST by x5452
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqclamar

I find it interesting that you go off on homosexuals when the pedophile discussed in the article is a "girl-lover" in his terms. Just an idle observation!


12 posted on 12/20/2005 1:24:28 PM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqclamar

"I am myself a pedophile, a girllover to be specific."

Correction: I am myself a pedophile, a girl-luster, to be specific.


14 posted on 12/20/2005 1:25:55 PM PST by RoadTest (Religion never saved a soul - that's Jesus' job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqclamar

A knowledge base should have as it resource people knowledgeable in their fields, not opinion-exchangers learning from - - - each other.


16 posted on 12/20/2005 1:27:30 PM PST by RoadTest (Religion never saved a soul - that's Jesus' job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

You guys think we should FReep it beyond the point of viability?

Edit every article until it becomes as useless and detrimental as the liberal horse$#!+ they are trying to feed us with?


17 posted on 12/20/2005 1:28:04 PM PST by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqclamar

"Is there any reason conservatives cannot step in and also edit these?"

Not according to their stated rules. However, if they're THAT Liberal, maybe our inputs wouldn't be accepted without "editing".


18 posted on 12/20/2005 1:30:14 PM PST by RoadTest (Religion never saved a soul - that's Jesus' job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqclamar

Sorry, I like wikipedia and have fair confidence in my ability to filter out the garbage.
If nothing else, it is frequently a good place to start.


21 posted on 12/20/2005 1:32:06 PM PST by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqclamar

I always thought Wikipedophile was pretty lame. I never liked for people to use it as a reference link and now I know why.


23 posted on 12/20/2005 1:33:12 PM PST by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqclamar
>Any parent out there who allows their children to access Wikipedia is putting them at danger of being exposed to the very worst of internet scum


25 posted on 12/20/2005 1:33:50 PM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqclamar

"You shouldn't expect anything less though from Wikipedia, which was founded by an Internet pornography mogul "

That's a new one one me. Care to back that up. Not saying it's not true, just requesting proof.


33 posted on 12/20/2005 1:42:23 PM PST by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqclamar

I hear pedophiles shop at Wal-Mart, too!


43 posted on 12/20/2005 1:49:30 PM PST by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqclamar

wiki may be interesting to some, but it's not reliable. I've been turned off by those who use it as a source and it's definitely not for kids.


50 posted on 12/20/2005 1:55:41 PM PST by Nanny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqclamar

I don't know how any real researcher or scholar can take Wikipedia with any seriousness.


68 posted on 12/20/2005 2:12:30 PM PST by toddlintown (Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lqclamar
one of its highest level administrators is a disgraced ex-lawyer who got disbarred by a state supreme court for soliciting prostitutes.

And goes by the name of CLinton by any chance?

71 posted on 12/20/2005 2:27:18 PM PST by ichabod1 (Sic Omnia Gloria Fugit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson