This doesn't surprise me one bit. Wikipedia is full of filthy left-wing sickos who either promote this garbage in the name of "tolerance" for homosexuals or - worse - are engaged in it themselves.
You shouldn't expect anything less though from Wikipedia, which was founded by an Internet pornography mogul and has known left-wing radicals and sexual deviants operating at the highest levels of the site's administration. Several of wikipedia's administrators are homosexual activists and one of its highest level administrators is a disgraced ex-lawyer who got disbarred by a state supreme court for soliciting prostitutes.
Any parent out there who allows their children to access Wikipedia is putting them at danger of being exposed to the very worst of internet scum.
1 posted on
12/20/2005 1:09:51 PM PST by
lqclamar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: lqclamar
Who could take a publication seriously where waht will be presented as truth is voted on by poll ala American idol?
2 posted on
12/20/2005 1:12:58 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: lqclamar
More filth at Wikipedia - the defendant in the case at the link here is currently a top level administrator at Wikipedia.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=co&vol=1999sc%5Csc0125a&invol=1
3 posted on
12/20/2005 1:14:04 PM PST by
lqclamar
To: lqclamar
Welp, yesterday was the last day I'll use WikiWaki. Nevermore.
4 posted on
12/20/2005 1:14:43 PM PST by
Killborn
(Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
To: lqclamar
Wikipedia is a good source of information, but like most sources - one must be wary of embedded propaganda in politically sensitive topics.
5 posted on
12/20/2005 1:15:00 PM PST by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: lqclamar
Here is a link for it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophile
7 posted on
12/20/2005 1:17:45 PM PST by
bubman
To: lqclamar
"I would like to see child-orientated pedophiles, openly allowed to be around children, without having to keep the issue of their sexuality a secret. I would like to see the public, come to accept that such peoples are not dangerous, and that having them around children, or even trusting them with the care of a child, is not a risk. "We have a long way to go before such goals can be achieved, but I try as I may, whenever I can, to open the eyes of the ignorant on this matter, and ask for their understanding.
"I live as a GOD worshipping, child-lover, Blessed as long as I long as I put him first". But I put children second."Scumbag. Hang him in the town square.
8 posted on
12/20/2005 1:19:56 PM PST by
rattrap
To: lqclamar
Is there any reason conservatives cannot step in and also edit these?
9 posted on
12/20/2005 1:22:04 PM PST by
x5452
To: lqclamar
I find it interesting that you go off on homosexuals when the pedophile discussed in the article is a "girl-lover" in his terms. Just an idle observation!
12 posted on
12/20/2005 1:24:28 PM PST by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: lqclamar
"I am myself a pedophile, a girllover to be specific."
Correction: I am myself a pedophile, a girl-luster, to be specific.
14 posted on
12/20/2005 1:25:55 PM PST by
RoadTest
(Religion never saved a soul - that's Jesus' job.)
To: lqclamar
A knowledge base should have as it resource people knowledgeable in their fields, not opinion-exchangers learning from - - - each other.
16 posted on
12/20/2005 1:27:30 PM PST by
RoadTest
(Religion never saved a soul - that's Jesus' job.)
To: All
You guys think we should FReep it beyond the point of viability?
Edit every article until it becomes as useless and detrimental as the liberal horse$#!+ they are trying to feed us with?
17 posted on
12/20/2005 1:28:04 PM PST by
Killborn
(Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
To: lqclamar
"Is there any reason conservatives cannot step in and also edit these?"
Not according to their stated rules. However, if they're THAT Liberal, maybe our inputs wouldn't be accepted without "editing".
18 posted on
12/20/2005 1:30:14 PM PST by
RoadTest
(Religion never saved a soul - that's Jesus' job.)
To: lqclamar
Sorry, I like wikipedia and have fair confidence in my ability to filter out the garbage.
If nothing else, it is frequently a good place to start.
21 posted on
12/20/2005 1:32:06 PM PST by
Little Ray
(I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
To: lqclamar
I always thought Wikipedophile was pretty lame. I never liked for people to use it as a reference link and now I know why.
To: lqclamar
>Any parent out there who allows their children to access Wikipedia is putting them at danger of being exposed to the very worst of internet scum

To: lqclamar
"You shouldn't expect anything less though from Wikipedia, which was founded by an Internet pornography mogul "
That's a new one one me. Care to back that up. Not saying it's not true, just requesting proof.
33 posted on
12/20/2005 1:42:23 PM PST by
ndt
To: lqclamar
I hear pedophiles shop at Wal-Mart, too!
43 posted on
12/20/2005 1:49:30 PM PST by
Junior
(Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
To: lqclamar
wiki may be interesting to some, but it's not reliable. I've been turned off by those who use it as a source and it's definitely not for kids.
50 posted on
12/20/2005 1:55:41 PM PST by
Nanny7
To: lqclamar
I don't know how any real researcher or scholar can take Wikipedia with any seriousness.
68 posted on
12/20/2005 2:12:30 PM PST by
toddlintown
(Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
To: lqclamar
one of its highest level administrators is a disgraced ex-lawyer who got disbarred by a state supreme court for soliciting prostitutes. And goes by the name of CLinton by any chance?
71 posted on
12/20/2005 2:27:18 PM PST by
ichabod1
(Sic Omnia Gloria Fugit)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson