Well, I didn't say that the judge determined whether religion can be taught in public schools (BTW, the judge explicitly said that ID can be taught, just not as if it were science, which it's patently not). What I said is that the judge determined whether religion can be taught as if it were science, in place of science.
Ah, thank you for clearing up, I misunderstood you.
I still don't think it's up to a judge to even take these cases. This is to be determined by the local folks, and if they make a stupid decision, it's theirs. This would not be an issue if it weren't associated with religion, (I don't believe).
susie