To: ndt
"It's funny how the Darwin Fundies in the trial never addressed the science that the ID supporters presented."
The court did address the defendants scientific claims and every witness for the defense repudiated their own sworn testimony in previous signed affidavits.
I think they did it because the trial wasn't going the way they thought it would so they recanted to avoid perjury charges. Behe is the standout example.
No wonder the DI didn't want this to go to court. It cut their wedge strategy off at the knees.
Now they will have to come up with a new idea. Look for Theistic Evolution to be the next DI gambit.
To: beaver fever; truthfinder9
"It's funny how the Darwin Fundies in the trial never addressed the science that the ID supporters presented."
Whoops....
That was actually a snip I was quoting from "truthfinder9" in post 18. I'll ping him/her here so he/she sees it.
163 posted on
12/20/2005 7:53:05 PM PST by
ndt
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson