Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ndt
"It's funny how the Darwin Fundies in the trial never addressed the science that the ID supporters presented."

The court did address the defendants scientific claims and every witness for the defense repudiated their own sworn testimony in previous signed affidavits.

I think they did it because the trial wasn't going the way they thought it would so they recanted to avoid perjury charges. Behe is the standout example.

No wonder the DI didn't want this to go to court. It cut their wedge strategy off at the knees.

Now they will have to come up with a new idea. Look for Theistic Evolution to be the next DI gambit.
161 posted on 12/20/2005 7:47:24 PM PST by beaver fever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: beaver fever; truthfinder9

"It's funny how the Darwin Fundies in the trial never addressed the science that the ID supporters presented."

Whoops....

That was actually a snip I was quoting from "truthfinder9" in post 18. I'll ping him/her here so he/she sees it.


163 posted on 12/20/2005 7:53:05 PM PST by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson