I just love it when troll defenders try to play.
"I defended no one."
Really?
Post 44:
Please Linda, you're going to ruin a perfectly good "troll frenzy"
44 posted on 12/20/2005 12:01:46 PM EST by WhiteGuy (Vote for gridlock)
Try again.
"I posted a response to someone who was, rightly or wrongly, commenting on the substance of the article, not just the perceived character of the thread originator."
*snort*
The trolls have been trying to say that the President has done something Illegal and they have no idea what FISA says.
THAT was what the troll was saying.
And yes, you are defending teh troll again, in post 169.
And you're yelping.
Toss a stone into a pack of dogs, and the one that yelps is the one you hit.
"I really don't care who decides to start the "zot" threads or who decides to end them. I have no problem with the mods or the boss or even you for that matter."
You had a problem with this one, as per post 44.
"I see the zot threads for what they are, and for why they are started."
You just contradicted yourself.
You claimed above that you had no problem with them.
Funny, you whined in post 44 about it.
sorry bro, should have been there for your six...
rule number one...
Never leave your Leadman....
Rule number two..
Never leave your Wingman...