Don't be too cocky here. The Dover group is actually fairly lucky that the judge didn't throw them in jail. It seems that they _lied_ early on in the case about their motivations, and some factual matters.
I would _strongly urge_ ID people to not use this case as a jumping board, precisely because we cannot be tied to people who lie to promote their cause. I have full confidence in ID, as well as Creationism, but I have to agree with this judge that the Dover board was engaged in some fishy business with regards to this suit.
You might be right about the defendants, but I still think the judge allowed his personal anti religious bias effect his judicial conduct.
The religious motives of the defendants should not have been a subject of discussion.
The comments of the judge look to me very hateful toward religious faith in general.