Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom
has much more scientific support than a lot of scientists give it credit for.

No kidding. Can you point us towards actual SCIENTIFIC studies that show the validity of the Biblical creation story?

Anxiously awaiting your scientific, peer reviewed, evidence....

56 posted on 12/20/2005 9:48:45 AM PST by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: jess35

Gen 1:1 In the beginning...Supported by the big bang theory. There was a beginning. (Remember the meltdown when that was first proposed over the staedy state theory? Are you old enough?) Reminds me of the current reaction to ID.

Gen 1:2 And the earth was formless....fits with the scientific theory of solar syatem formation.

Gen 1:2 ...and void... no life yet

Gen 1:3 Then God said, "Let there be light...." A star has to reach a certain mass in order for it to ignite.

Now a break...-creation took time; supported by science.
-creation happened in a certain order; very similar to that which is supported by the ToE.

Gen 1:11&12 The earth brought forth vegetation. See the thread: "Shaped from clay [origin of life]"?

Gen 1:20 Then God said, "Let the waters teems with swarms of living creatures...." Life arose in the seas.

Gen 1:24 Then God said, "Let the earth bring forth living creatures after their kind..." Clay again, also with man.

Also note that it was fish first, then sea creatures and birds, then mammals, and finally man.

I don't see anything in the creation account that contradicts current scientific theories.


62 posted on 12/20/2005 9:54:26 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson