Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

Interesting, is that technology that was developed by ARCO, then? So they were allowed to sell the LNG, but not the oil?

Anyway, the road block to LNG in the US is the not in our back yard attitude toward the ports.


78 posted on 12/21/2005 11:36:38 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: Eva
Anyway, the road block to LNG in the US is the not in our back yard attitude toward the ports.

I believe they will have them anyways. Alaska is not going to meet their entire need. LNG will be brought into the US from multiple ports. Areas that refuse to allow ports can pay added cost to transport by pipeline from the areas that due have the ports. Design and Construction of LNG ports is becoming a booming business. I have gotten several job offers to move back south to be on one of the teams. The NIMBY's have hurt California over and over, why would it by different this time?

Merry Christmas Eva

79 posted on 12/21/2005 11:50:50 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: Eva
Interesting, is that technology that was developed by ARCO, then? So they were allowed to sell the LNG, but not the oil?

I think it was partly due to restriction put on "North Slope" production. Also at the time, 1969, there was a glut of Natural Gas in Southcentral Alaska. Not the case today, there is talk of building an LNG terminal to import Natural Gas into the Anchorage, Kenai & Mat-Su valley.

80 posted on 12/21/2005 11:53:22 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson