Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

Yeah, shipping Egyptian LNG to Japan. You're mixing apples and oranges. Like I said I don't care which pipeline gets approved. I don't have a horse in this race. I was just commenting that BP's MO is control of the industry, which usually results in the restriction of trade.

If BP was smart and not so self centered as a company, they would turn over the negotiations to CONOCO, because CONOCO does not have a history with the state of Alaska, that would work against them. BP would also turn over control of the pipeline to Conoco. But that would all go against the grain of BP.


76 posted on 12/21/2005 11:19:36 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Eva
Yeah, shipping Egyptian LNG to Japan.

Can you read past the first paragraph? The second reads:

The liquefaction technology is an enhanced version of the technology utilized for ConocoPhillips' Kenai, Alaska, facility. The Kenai facility was constructed by Bechtel Corporation in 1969 and has since demonstrated more than 33 years of uninterrupted LNG supply to Japan.

77 posted on 12/21/2005 11:28:27 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson