He should be swinging from a rope in the town square.
Harlan should be surgically altered to match his surviving victims condition, then he should be brutally raped by his fellow inmates. Only in a perfect world.
The killing will occur in prison and the victim will be someone in jail for a non-violent crime, or a prison guard or other person doing work there, maybe even a missionary.
The judges know this, so whether they send the killer to Old Sparky to turn him or her into a crispy critter, they've actually condemned someone else to death.
Moral Absolutes Ping.
A very bad decision. Reading the Bible should certainly have no bearing on the jury's decision being valid. Total and utter idiocy. What if the jurors remembered Biblical or other religious teachings? What if jurors believed in the Bible (or other scriptures?) Why just consider an actual Bible verboten? If this is legitimate, then eventually only atheists and secularists will be fit jurors.
Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.
All murderers and forcible rapists should be executed. Anything less is cruelty to the innocent.
So, he's saying hat they can't use a Bible because it wasn't introduced during the trial?
Well, pinhead, what did the witnesses swear to tell the truth on? What do you think THAT was about, idiot?
Isn't the BIBLE what they swear on "to tell the truth, the whole thruth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God."? (or something to that effect) How can you expect people to swear on the Bible and then tell them they can't consult it to make a decision?
What the hell is this anti-Christian bullcrap?
I don't get it. The Supreme Court uses laws in foreign countries can be used to make rulings in legal proceedings in the United States, but claims that using the Bible goes against the Constitution.
How can that make sense to anybody?
Here's another article, slightly more info:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1543813/posts
Man Once On Death Row Gets Sentenced To Life In Prison (Bible used by juror)