Really? So if Saddam Hussein didn't have an attorney, that would still be a fair trial?
That's about as smart as saying that defense attorneys in the U.S. love crime.
Saddam has competent Iraqi attorneys.
Clark, who has no knowledge of Iraqi law, volunteered in order to hurt this Administration's efforts in Iraq --- there's no other reason for his actions, and you know it.
As long as it pays monetarily OR ideologically.
I have read what Clark says..Try it.
Of course Saddam must have defense attorneys for a fair trial..Clark is still anti American. He has been for years.
http://shadow.autono.net/sin001/clark.htm
THE MYSTERIOUS RAMSEY CLARK:
STALINIST DUPE OR RULING-CLASS SPOOK?
Specify where, exactly, the individual you addressed said Saddam Hussein should not have an attorney?
That's about as smart as saying that defense attorneys in the U.S. love crime.
No, it would be more like saying that a person widely known to despise his country is a person who despises his country. Calling a spade a spade, so to speak.
Don't they?