The problem is the guy is here a couple of weeks so the usual reactionaries are trying to drive him away. It was obvious from reading the exchanges, that you characterize as not serious, that there was a dialogue going on, in which he may learn something. Readers may also be learning and the constant harping and personal comments by the usual suspects were disrupting.
The fact that you don't acknowledge the false comments made about his leaving is disengenuous on your part.
I read his posts. All of 2 threads. Some were rude.
It was obvious from reading the exchanges, that you characterize as not serious, that there was a dialogue going on,
The "dialogue" was mostly trying to get him to actually READ FISA instead of the NY Times.
The fact that you don't acknowledge the false comments made about his leaving is disengenuous on your part.
You want them hung from the yardarm or what?
And you're on this thread to discuss the Times? Or OTHER Freepers conduct?