Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Holdek

You need to do some research troll.
Tell me, how's that New York Times job coming?


178 posted on 12/19/2005 4:24:59 PM PST by Darksheare ("Keep it just between us..." she said, and then she faded into the mist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: Darksheare

He would never think to work at the NYT because he thinks wiretaping an "association" does not include wiretaping the people working for said association.

Hence, he couldn't work for the NYT, as it is a corporation, and obviously does things without the benefit of human employees, just like his contruct of a self-automated association.


182 posted on 12/19/2005 4:28:28 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

To: Darksheare

Your rudeness aside....

You can post insults. I will post the law.

(a)
(1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that--

NOW, READ THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY. IN ORDER FOR THIS TO WORK, A, B AND C HAVE TO BE OPERATIVE. OTHERWISE IT IS ILLEGAL:

(A) the electronic surveillance is solely directed at--
(i) the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers, as defined in section 1801 (a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title; or
(ii) the acquisition of technical intelligence, other than the spoken communications of individuals, from property or premises under the open and exclusive control of a foreign power, as defined in section 1801 (a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title;
(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party; and
(C) the proposed minimization procedures with respect to such surveillance meet the definition of minimization procedures under section 1801 (h) of this title; and if the Attorney General reports such minimization procedures and any changes thereto to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence at least thirty days prior to their effective date, unless the Attorney General determines immediate action is required and notifies the committees immediately of such minimization procedures and the reason for their becoming effective immediately.


183 posted on 12/19/2005 4:28:42 PM PST by Holdek (Real conservatives support the Bill of Rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

To: Darksheare
Tell me, how's that New York Times job coming?

You reading my mind? :o) That thought was just passing through my mind.....that someone set up here prior to NYT leak. Who wants to see the Republicans/Conservatives split on this? Who would it benefit?

273 posted on 12/19/2005 8:01:12 PM PST by daybreakcoming (May God bless those who enter the valley of the shadow of death so that we may see the light of day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson