[Holdek]

No, it doesn't. As much as you would like to believe it, a person does not stop being a US person because they are part of an association. Read this part carefully:

(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication TO WHICH A UNITED STATES PERSON IS A PARTY; and

If a United States person is a party, at all, it means you cannot get a warentless wiretap. That is the LAW. I have cited it repeatedly. There is no part of the law that reads "Except in cases when that person is part of an association." If there is, please post it.

[Darksheare]

"(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication TO WHICH A UNITED STATES PERSON IS A PARTY;...

Eavesdropping Program Netted Local Man

[MeanWestTexan]

Alas, Section 1801, (the portion of the statute that defines "United States Person") disagrees with you.

[bigsigh]

I disagree with your interpretation, but thanx for hanging in while taking shots from the usual idiots.

The fact that you stayed while some serious posters respond to your viewpoint provided a good educational thread, unlike the ones which are taken over by hair-triggered wannabe gatekeepers.