Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: phs3
As far as I am concerned if your phone number comes up on an aQ cell phone in Afghanistan, you have allot of explaining to do American citizen or not.

Agreed. And it would be a simple matter for the government to get a warrant to monitor any communications you make over your telephone.
38 posted on 12/19/2005 10:31:46 AM PST by BikerNYC (Modernman should not have been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: BikerNYC
why should they have to, if there are already laws saying they don't have too.
43 posted on 12/19/2005 10:36:47 AM PST by phs3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: BikerNYC

And it would be a simple matter for the government to get a warrant to monitor any communications you make over your telephone"

This quote from Byron Yorks column presents the argument for the policy and knocks down the 'simple matter to get a warrant' response:

Lawmakers of both parties recognized the problem in the months after the September 11 terrorist attacks. They pointed to the case of Coleen Rowley, the FBI agent who ran up against a number roadblocks in her effort to secure a FISA warrant in the case of Zacarias Moussaoui, the al Qaeda operative who had taken flight training in preparation for the hijackings.

Investigators wanted to study the contents of Moussaoui's laptop computer, but the FBI bureaucracy involved in applying for a FISA warrant was stifling, and there were real questions about whether investigators could meet the FISA court's probable-cause standard for granting a warrant. FBI agents became so frustrated that they considered flying Moussaoui to France, where his computer could be examined. But then the attacks came, and it was too late.

Rowley wrote up her concerns in a famous 13-page memo to FBI Director Robert Mueller, and then elaborated on them in testimony to Congress. "Rowley depicted the legal mechanism for security warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, as burdensome and restrictive, a virtual roadblock to effective law enforcement," Legal Times reported in September 2002.


102 posted on 12/19/2005 1:03:51 PM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson