Replies

The new electronic voting machines are more fraud proof than anything we have used in the past

An electronic machine does what it's programmed to do. If it's programmed to spit out a billion votes for Hillary, it'll do so.

That's why paper verification is essential.

I find it hard to believe that Diebold can't produce a machine capable of securely and accurately recording a vote tally. The Voting machine market is small potatoes compared to their business in the financial world. They have too much at stake to produce corruptible machines. This is all a Dem smokescreen.

That being said here is the Dem's fifth column in regards to voting IMHO:

A. Fight to the death for IDless voting as it allows multiple voting in Dem districts.

B. Paper is Essential!...Necessary votes can be gleefully generated weeks after the fact in the homes of Dem operatives while they enjoy "The Jerry Springer show" and "Oprah".

C. Tighten rules, mail out late, and discard as many military ballots as possible.

D. Push for Felonry Voting rights as they vote 90 percent Demorat.

Did I miss anything?

An electronic machine does what it's programmed to do. If it's programmed to spit out a billion votes for Hillary, it'll do so
Well, I don't think electronic voting machines are programed to do any such thing. There may be a few bugs in the systems but programing them to commit fraud is doubtful. Dims can't win with their message so it must be the voting machines is a bunch of BS. Republicans don't run every county or local elections in this country so don't you think the elections ran by the Dims would refuse to buy the machines if they thought they were programed to make Dims lose? I for one am not believing it. It's just MSM and liberal propaganda. Besides, if they give paper receipts to each voter in a precinct that has 10,000 voters just how big a roll of paper we going to need? Will be hiring fork truck drivers to put a 1000 lb roll of paper in the machine? Logistics of giving a paper receipt to each voter is not as simple as some would think.