[penelopesire]

bump for a later read. Impressive stuff! Good job!

[Fracas]

An exhaustive list of instances when the New York Times has endangered national security over the past half century would take many more pages, but the point has been made. Enough is enough.

Well done. You've named the usual suspects and connected the dots. Memories are short, and many are new to politics. The Press has received a free pass for far too long. Demanding accountability is NOT a violation of the First Amendment.

[Capt. Tom]

Thanks Fedora.

I appreciate your effort that goes into a piece like this.

Reading is fast, putting something like this together takes time and research. - tom

[trebb]

I agree the NYT sucks and is complicit in traitorous/treasonous acts, but it can't divulge secrets that others don't first leak to it. We really need to prosecute these folks.

[End Times Sentinel]

Got about a third of the way through, printing it up for the train ride home, darn fine peice of work otta you!

Owl_Eagle

(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,

 it was probably sarcasm)

[Tijeras_Slim]

Original FReeper Research

Magnificent work!

[presently no screen name]

bookmark

[stephenjohnbanker]

Great job!! BTTT!!

[BeHoldAPaleHorse]

"Exhibit A: Compromising the U-2

"In early 1960 Alsop wrote a story for the New York Times hinting at US knowledge of secret Soviet missile developments."

The NYT can be held to blame for a lot of bad things--except this one. The Russians knew about the U-2 from its first flight over the USSR--they were really PO'd about it for 4 years, until they finally shot one down. (They were filing all kinds of diplomatic protests until May 1st, 1960, when they simply said "Who's yer daddy?")

[sure_fine]

ping

[The_Republican]

NYT traitors have a special place in Hell!

[Enchante]

Outstanding work, thanks!!!!!!!

Unfortunately, I have no confidence that anything will ever be done about the treasonous charlatans of the NY Times. Best we can hope for is to educate enough of the public so that the influence of such anti-American weasels may be limited........

[Zacs Mom]

Bookmarked ~ thank you for your research on this!

It is plan to see that ...

... this has been true for a very long time!!

[okie01]

Curious, indeed, that whenever national security is compromised, the New York Times can be counted upon -- to have their hand in the cookie jar.

[Brad from Tennessee]

OUTSTANDING!

[Jack Black]

Interesting, well researched article.

[wvobiwan]

This says it all right here:

"To what extent these attempts to purge Communist elements from the Times were successful is unknown.'

Fact is, they were NOT successful, at the Slimes or at the Globe, or any of today's leftist rags.

Any effort to promote global socialist/communist agendas will be tolerated, including pro-terrorism, treason, manufacturing stories, yellow- and checkbook-journalism, political scams, smears and entrapment, Goebbels would be proud of their tactics.

I like another's comments here: Accountability is NOT a violation of the 1st Amendment.

[lilylangtree]

With all the scandals originating from this newspaper, why does it still stay in business? How long is enough is enough?

[pabianice]

Old Grey Hooker Ping!

[flutters]

This is excellent, Fedora. Very nice!