Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eva; AliVeritas; saveliberty; radioproducer; Tony Snow; tiredoflaundry; FOXFANVOX; mware; TomGuy; ..
Speaking of spying.

Anyone else seen this thread?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1542415/posts

Eavesdropping Program Netted Local Man
WBNS-10TV ^ | Dec. 16

Posted on 12/17/2005 10:12:01 AM PST by iPod Shuffle

Eavesdropping Program Netted Local Man

Dec 16, 2005, 02:35 PM

Reported by Kurt Ludlow

A former Columbus truck driver linked to Al-Qaeda was nabbed as part of a secret operation that's now out of the bag. The government spied on him and hundreds of other Americans without warrants.

It was a front page New York Times article that divulged for the first time that the National Security Agency spied on Americans, monitoring international phone calls and emails of hundreds of people including a Columbus man.

Columbus truck driver Iyman Farris pled guilty in 2003 to helping Al-Qaeda plan terrorist attacks in the US, and it was an admission that stunned his ex wife.

Geneva Bowling says, "It's still hard for me to believe that he did."

Two years later, Bowling knows that Faris was caught after agents monitored the couple's phone without a court order. She told the Associated Press, "If you're asking me if I think that's fair, I think it is."

Constitutional lawyer Benson Wolman says there's a reason court orders are required before the government can listen in on you; there must be probable cause you've done something wrong.

"While most of us aren't going to be victims of wiretap or eavesdrop, it's important to now that if the government can do it to the worst of us, it can do it to the best of us," says Wolman.

Supporters of the secret wiretapping order say desperate times since 9-11 call for desperate measures.

"In the perfect world we would just continue with laws as they were prior to 9-11 and we are unable to combat with due diligence and continue to face this new challenge. The fact is we can't do that," says one supporter.

A lot of lawmakers say they're troubled by this sort of domestic spying. The Senate has promised to hold hearings on it.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
; Click to Add Topic
KEYWORDS: COUNTERTERRORISM; IYMANFARRIS; JIHADINAMERICA; KUBARK; NSA; OHIO; PATRIOTACT; PATRIOTLEAK; TERRORTRIALS;

I'd just have to say that this guy's arrest was one for the good guys.

If halting the Patriot Act would mean that scuzzballs such as this couldn't be listened to, would you want to be the one responsible for stopping it?

1,728 posted on 12/19/2005 11:47:39 AM PST by TruthNtegrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1423 | View Replies ]


To: TruthNtegrity
That's good. Shows it works. If we start wiretaping some of these congresscritters, we can find out who the leaker is.

Why weren't they so up in arms when Newt's cell phone was tapped by a couple of old fart democrats a few years ago?

1,739 posted on 12/19/2005 11:53:43 AM PST by b4its2late (Eye souport publik edekashun two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1728 | View Replies ]

To: TruthNtegrity
If halting the Patriot Act would mean that scuzzballs such as this couldn't be listened to, would you want to be the one responsible for stopping it?

My understanding is that sunsetting of the Patriot Act would not stop the sort of investigation that uncovered this man's involvement in this plot.

1,742 posted on 12/19/2005 11:55:16 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1728 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson