[Byron_the_Aussie]

...this "Marine" should be charged with trespassing and malicious destruction of property for starters...

Fair enough. As long as you're charged with first-degree pomposity, Bill.

I know which of you two the jury would send to the Big House.

[ActionNewsBill]

As long as you're charged with first-degree pomposity, Bill.

I just call them the way I see them.

If this clown was still an active Marine, I have no doubt he would be charged with conduct unbecoming a US Marine.

[Long Distance Rider]

"Fair enough. As long as you're charged with first-degree pomposity, Bill."

Actually Bill is right on the money. If this former Marine was caught on MY yard destroying anything, He probably would need medical treatment.
Just last week we were excoriating a Jewish women in North Carolina who was "outraged" over a Christian sign at a McDonald's. The vast majority of us sided with the McDonald's owner. In my opinion, this is the same thing. That is the homeowner's right of free speech. We can be outraged but we do not have the right to destroy his property. If we are to have credibility, we should strive for consistency. Pomposity? If you think so that is your right, but you cannot damage me or my property over it.