Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cwiz24

Who has stated that in those cases the governmnet used 50 USC 1801 or 1802? I would assume they used laws already on the books and obtained the appropriate warrants. No one has said warrants were never issued.


64 posted on 12/19/2005 3:33:28 PM PST by 7mmMag@LeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: 7mmMag@LeftCoast
I didn't say that warrants weren't issues for those two cases. My point was that people who are considered legal U.S. citizens (e.g., John Walker Lindh and Jose Padilla) can and do communicate with Al Qaeda overseas. Monitoring people like these two individuals would not be legal under the law cited by the original poster of this thread. It may be perfectly legal under another law, but not this one.
76 posted on 12/20/2005 6:24:38 AM PST by cwiz24 (I worked very hard on this tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson