Skip to comments.
Democratic Leaders Urge Speaker to Hold Hearings on President's Authorization of National..
U.S. Newswire ^
Posted on 12/18/2005 3:45:58 PM PST by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
good grief.....
To: Sub-Driver
Regardless of whether that is true
I love these people.
They display their ignorance in their letters.
To: Sub-Driver
Hmm, missing step - finding, arresting and convicting whomever it was that violated the National Security Act in revealing top secret information to the press...
Oh, oops, forgot, these were the Democrats. No witch hunts that might expose liberals.
3
posted on
12/18/2005 3:48:58 PM PST
by
kingu
To: Sub-Driver
Nancy Pelosi
John Conyers
Henry Waxman
Boy, now there's a "mainstream" bunch.
4
posted on
12/18/2005 3:49:35 PM PST
by
digger48
To: Sub-Driver
Somebody's doing a bit of grandstanding, eh?
To: Sub-Driver
The Dems already went on record to look like idiots for the relatively few people who watch the sunday morning pundit shows.
Now they wanna rerun of looking stupid with the rest of the rats? Morons!
To: Sub-Driver
how about Bush announcing the AG prosecuting leakers.
7
posted on
12/18/2005 3:50:29 PM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
To: Sub-Driver
Whilst every Democratic Leader has the right to be a jerk, they seem to have abused that privilege!
8
posted on
12/18/2005 3:50:50 PM PST
by
FreeRep
To: Sub-Driver
God Help Us. Im just so angry! I wish I wasnt a news junkie, all it does is gives me stress. Im going to become one of Jay Leno's "Jay Walkers"
To: Sub-Driver
P.S. I hope that at some point in tonight speech he shows the documentation that they knew about it way back when and did nothing.
To: Sub-Driver
Regardless of whether that is true, we believe that the President's statements on the 17th, and the justifiable concern of the American people over the allegations in the Times article, require the House of Representatives to take steps immediately to conduct hearings on the scope of Presidential power in the area of electronic surveillance. The far left agenda in a nutshell.
Should one feel safe under the scrutiny of the likes of Pelosi as compared to Bush?
Only a felon would contemplate....
11
posted on
12/18/2005 3:52:31 PM PST
by
EGPWS
To: Sub-Driver
I want hearings into treason by the Democratic Party starting with Slick Willy Clinton selling hi-tech to China and up to, and including, the hate America campaign consucted by Harry Reid, Ted Kennedy, john Kerry, John Murtha, the NY Times, Washington Post and the rest of the liberal media.
(Pretty modest start, don't you think?)
To: Sub-Driver
If we are going to have hearings, then I feel that Pelosi, Reid, Gephardt and Daschle, among others, should be put under oath and required to tell us what they were briefed on, and explain why they did not report these "crimes."
To: Sub-Driver; All; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; mhking; Memother; Alamo-Girl; chesty_puller; GRRRRR; ...
14
posted on
12/18/2005 3:55:14 PM PST
by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(secus acutulus exspiro ab Acheron bipes actio absol ab Acheron supplico)
To: Sub-Driver
Gee... Can anyone say "stick it you jerk?"
To: Sub-Driver
I urge President Bush to detain the NYT reporter who leaked this story and threaten a trip to G'itmo for treason unless he releases his source.
The source gets a guaranteed trip to G'itmo for treason.
16
posted on
12/18/2005 3:59:04 PM PST
by
DTogo
(Merry CHRISTmas, and a healthy & happy New Year!)
To: Sub-Driver
You think they want to include in the hearings finding out who leaked the story and how they should be prosecuted?
17
posted on
12/18/2005 3:59:25 PM PST
by
hophead
("Enjoy Every Sandwich")
To: Morgan in Denver
I'll say it in Austrailian -- "CLEAR OFF!"
18
posted on
12/18/2005 4:00:05 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Sub-Driver
Why don't they just wait 10 days for the Book to come out and convict Bush then?? What a bunch of Maroons.
Pray for W and Our Victorious Troops
19
posted on
12/18/2005 4:00:41 PM PST
by
bray
(Merry Christmas Iraq)
To: Sub-Driver
An article in the December 16 issue of the New York Times, "Bush Lets U.S. Spy on Callers Without Courts" has led to the inevitable conclusion that the President was referring to an authorization to allow the NSA to conduct warrantless electronic surveillance of U.S. persons. Isn't this classic? There has to be a name for this by now. Can we call it the "springboard-to-Congressional-hearings" move?
All it takes is an allegation now? Unbelieveable.
20
posted on
12/18/2005 4:00:58 PM PST
by
mattdono
("Crush the RATs and RINOs, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of the scumbags" - Arnie)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson