Irrelevant; it is more than possible to prevent phones from working inside the theater itself, while still working outside the building. You know it, so your strenuous attempts to claim otherwise don't speak well of your integrity.
But really, the bottom line is, Mr. PhD, is that jammers are illegal and continue to be illegal...
The subject of the thread is whether they should be illegal; everyone knows they are. Since you've run out of arguments, you fall back on might making right. Impressive.
"Irrelevant; it is more than possible to prevent phones from working inside the theater itself, while still working outside the building"
No....and Yes. You are oversimplifying, and that's the problem with things like this. You just don't understand the subject enough to grasp the subtleties, as you have so greatly shown.
You've come up with hair-brained scenarios, technical approaches, and even tried to throw credentials around, and you are still wrong.
And what you advocate is, and will remain forever, illegal in the United States - whether you think it should or should not be so. It's not an argument of "might makes right", it's an argument that users of such jammers have no idea how to (or whether to) deploy these things, even if it were allowed and reasonable to do so. It is neither.
Now will you give up, please? I don't want to be accused of running from a good debate, but really, this one is so one-sided as to not even be amusing anymore.