Too bad.
It'll be back, though. It was a poor presentation of the case, imho, throughout.
The MSM was solidly opposed to openness and ran a stellar disinformation campaign throughout.
Indeed, the decision may be appealed - or a new case may begin. I agree that the press weighed in inappropriately and that the defense was poorly argued, but that may have been the consequence of the facts of the case - that there was an alternative book offered. The Discovery Institute itself has only suggested that the controversy be taught, not alternative theories - that puts it in a different ballpark.
The decision is linked at post 90 and 92.