Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: snowsislander
The real economic indicator for comparison is GDP per capita with China at $6,000 vs. the United Kingdom's at $29,600 or the United States at $40,000.
12 posted on 12/18/2005 2:08:04 PM PST by Amish with an attitude (An armed society is a polite society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Amish with an attitude
The real economic indicator for comparison is GDP per capita with China at $6,000 vs. the United Kingdom's at $29,600 or the United States at $40,000.

You are correct that this is the most popular measure among economists. If I don't miss my guess, you are using the CIA World Factbook numbers for GDP per capita, which are converted via a PPP rate rather than an actual exchange rate. I happen to prefer real exchange rates (which puts the U.K. at $35,736 for 2005 (from here and the current Bloomberg rate of $1.77 per pound), and China at considerably less than $6,000).

For what it is worth, another implication of using PPP rates for GDP would mean that with China's new-found GDP statistics that it is already growing close to the U.S. GDP when adjusted for such PPP.

14 posted on 12/18/2005 3:22:50 PM PST by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson