Posted on 12/17/2005 11:34:44 AM PST by wagglebee
In one of the most deadly phenomena of our time – or any time – Hollywood has produced a film called "Brokeback Mountain," which glorifies and glamorizes that male sodomy which remains the cause of so many thousands of deaths by AIDS – and now by syphilis.
The Washington Post's Style section reports (with more than apparent approval) that this latest sodomy-acceptance propaganda has lead the year's films with seven Golden Globe nominations. And in Los Angeles, New York and San Francisco (those three leading AIDS-distribution points) this new movie "opened in five sold-out theaters."
But the Post also reports: "Many recycled jokes about the film, the most popular being that it ought to have been called 'Bareback Mountain' – 'bareback,' in gayspeak, is a word for unsafe sex."
Only in "gayspeak"? Since when?
And what kind of homosexual anal sex is ever safe – even with a condom?
The Post also reported that this film is the story of "two vagabonds whose lifelong affair begins in Brokeback Mountain on a chilly night in 1963. Then they part ways, marry women who don't know their secret and have children, only to reunite four years later with a deep, fiery, longing kiss that is arguably the most passionate man-on-man kiss to have been put on screen."
How really uplifting! How marvelously moral! What a glorious contribution to national morality!
How can I possibly resist seeing this inimitable osculatory foreplay to cowboy buggery?
Let me assure you that I shall resist.
And I am compelled to wonder when Hollywood will be producing a cowboy bestiality film – an on-the-range romance of real animal love – but only, of course, with a freely consenting beast.
Thanks.
Never! You darn Yankees and West Coasters are sick! Arkansans are straight sheep lovers!
Yeah, that's believable.
I know I have lots of gay friends...
Strange world we live in. You are probably correct. But in all seriousness, who would think anyone would want to see this film? Maybe I am a troglidite after all.
Don't be discouraged, it isn't YOU, ha.
The film's been raved over where it's been released: New York City, Los Angeles, Boston, San Francisco (I am nearly sure), etc., all major urban areas that are populated by large, homosexual and/or homosexual-indulgent groups. Culturally, they're raving about a film that "celebrates" their same immoralities.
All morality -- as in, religious -- aside, the characters in the film are devoid of honorable CHARACTER, display corrupt personal ETHICS, and THEN there's the homosexual acts. But it's a film that presents very corrupt persons that's being found to be a good film, which says far more about who says so than anything else. And who says so, to date, are the audiences seeing it: urban, homosexual, et al. persons.
Oh, and the Foreign Press (mostly all European extreme Liberals). They oohed. Little surprise there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.