Posted on 12/17/2005 11:34:44 AM PST by wagglebee
In one of the most deadly phenomena of our time or any time Hollywood has produced a film called "Brokeback Mountain," which glorifies and glamorizes that male sodomy which remains the cause of so many thousands of deaths by AIDS and now by syphilis.
The Washington Post's Style section reports (with more than apparent approval) that this latest sodomy-acceptance propaganda has lead the year's films with seven Golden Globe nominations. And in Los Angeles, New York and San Francisco (those three leading AIDS-distribution points) this new movie "opened in five sold-out theaters."
But the Post also reports: "Many recycled jokes about the film, the most popular being that it ought to have been called 'Bareback Mountain' 'bareback,' in gayspeak, is a word for unsafe sex."
Only in "gayspeak"? Since when?
And what kind of homosexual anal sex is ever safe even with a condom?
The Post also reported that this film is the story of "two vagabonds whose lifelong affair begins in Brokeback Mountain on a chilly night in 1963. Then they part ways, marry women who don't know their secret and have children, only to reunite four years later with a deep, fiery, longing kiss that is arguably the most passionate man-on-man kiss to have been put on screen."
How really uplifting! How marvelously moral! What a glorious contribution to national morality!
How can I possibly resist seeing this inimitable osculatory foreplay to cowboy buggery?
Let me assure you that I shall resist.
And I am compelled to wonder when Hollywood will be producing a cowboy bestiality film an on-the-range romance of real animal love but only, of course, with a freely consenting beast.
Think about this....when Gone With the Wind was made they struggled mightily with the censors over letting Clark Gable say, "Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn."
2 of America's greatest! I enjoy watching their old movies, they're still much better than any of the crud produced by Hollywierd these days.
Hollywood has made what was once considered shameful and sinful become chic and desirable. No wonder Americans are turning away from the faggot factory of Hollywood.
Does anyone remember a movie from the late 1960's, "The Boys in the Band," which was about a reunion of a group of gay guys and their straight friend who has just brokwn up with his wife.
In the movie, the gay guys all try to convince the straight guy that he is "one of them," but at the end he decides to go back to his wife.
Why aren't we telling our children that homosexuality is much worse for one's health than smoking?
|
I haven't watched or even cared about the Oscars in years. The last straw for me was when "Saving Private Ryan" lost out to "Shakespeare in Love."
I don't know what the problem is, all the reviews say the movie is 'FABULOUS"!
We hardly ever watch movies. Why should we open our minds to Hollyweird propaganda?
Let me give you my opinion of anal sex. Any man who passes up the finest thing God ever made in favor of an anus is probably wrong about a lot of other things too.
right on, Crouton! Think I'll mosey on over and give the old man a jump, just for that.. 'night now
I guess that's why some cowboys were their name on the back of their belt...it's so the other cowboys know who they're mating with...
Census department says the number is closer to one percent.
I tend to agree...up to a point.
My first impression after I even read this film was in preproduction was to refuse to even discuss it. Just not provide any mention of the thing.
I think the expectation by homosexuals is that there will be increased discussion about homosexuality becuase of the film, with the film as flint, or, well, "fuse" to get the public and mostly conservatives again discussing their ongoing attempts to make homosexuality the leading issue among the public of discussion, all that.
So, I hesitated to even discuss, mention this film up until about two, three days ago for that reason.
On the other hand, I've since decided that to not discuss it in very straightforward terms of declination of the title and contents, all the enthusiasm about the film from homosexuals about homosexuality in entertainment and otherwise remains the only public statement (and that should not be).
The people making the loudest and most exuberant comments and promotions of BMountain are predominantly those in the press and in cities such as New York, L.A....and, among the entertainment press, there's always a lot of excitement about homosexuality, so no surprise there (Golden Globes are awards by the Foreign Press, for example).
As an aside but an important one, to put a perspective on New York City's exuberance over this film, NYC has the highest rate of abortions nationwide, and among those, the highest rate of abortions among underage females.
David Geffen and Elton John will probably buy up all the tickets.
I'm venturing to guess most of us can figure out just WHO wrote all those enthusiastic reviews.
BMountain is a film about very bad characters without ethics and morals behaving even worse. No wonder it's being enthused about by people of similar degeneracy.
There is not one shred of heroism in the film, in the characters, in the author who wrote the wretched piece from whence this film was adapted. It's just one great big "rejoicing" by similarly corrupt persons in degeneracy.
No wonder some of them are said to be crying in the theatres about it: such "beautiful" degeneracy, such "wonderful" corruption and what "great" vileness.
It's so sad.
Blech!! I think I need to puke!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.