Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hollywood glorifies adulterous sodomy
WorldNetDaily ^ | 12/17/05 | Les Kinsolving

Posted on 12/17/2005 11:34:44 AM PST by wagglebee

In one of the most deadly phenomena of our time – or any time – Hollywood has produced a film called "Brokeback Mountain," which glorifies and glamorizes that male sodomy which remains the cause of so many thousands of deaths by AIDS – and now by syphilis.

The Washington Post's Style section reports (with more than apparent approval) that this latest sodomy-acceptance propaganda has lead the year's films with seven Golden Globe nominations. And in Los Angeles, New York and San Francisco (those three leading AIDS-distribution points) this new movie "opened in five sold-out theaters."

But the Post also reports: "Many recycled jokes about the film, the most popular being that it ought to have been called 'Bareback Mountain' – 'bareback,' in gayspeak, is a word for unsafe sex."

Only in "gayspeak"? Since when?

And what kind of homosexual anal sex is ever safe – even with a condom?

The Post also reported that this film is the story of "two vagabonds whose lifelong affair begins in Brokeback Mountain on a chilly night in 1963. Then they part ways, marry women who don't know their secret and have children, only to reunite four years later with a deep, fiery, longing kiss that is arguably the most passionate man-on-man kiss to have been put on screen."

How really uplifting! How marvelously moral! What a glorious contribution to national morality!

How can I possibly resist seeing this inimitable osculatory foreplay to cowboy buggery?

Let me assure you that I shall resist.

And I am compelled to wonder when Hollywood will be producing a cowboy bestiality film – an on-the-range romance of real animal love – but only, of course, with a freely consenting beast.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brokebackmountain; fudgepackmountain; goldenglobes; hollyweird; hollywood; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; kinsolving; moralabsolutes; moviereview; movies; preparationhollywood; pudding
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Graymatter
I'm remembering what passed for "mainstream" in the 70's,

Think about this....when Gone With the Wind was made they struggled mightily with the censors over letting Clark Gable say, "Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn."

41 posted on 12/17/2005 3:36:49 PM PST by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

2 of America's greatest! I enjoy watching their old movies, they're still much better than any of the crud produced by Hollywierd these days.


42 posted on 12/17/2005 3:39:49 PM PST by SeaBiscuit (God Bless all who defend America and Friends, the rest can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Casloy

Hollywood has made what was once considered shameful and sinful become chic and desirable. No wonder Americans are turning away from the faggot factory of Hollywood.


43 posted on 12/17/2005 3:42:43 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Does anyone remember a movie from the late 1960's, "The Boys in the Band," which was about a reunion of a group of gay guys and their straight friend who has just brokwn up with his wife.

In the movie, the gay guys all try to convince the straight guy that he is "one of them," but at the end he decides to go back to his wife.


44 posted on 12/17/2005 3:43:49 PM PST by Alouette (Learned Mother of Zion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; little jeremiah
The MSM movie reviewers are suggesting huge Oscar buzz about this movie. If nominated, this will be the first year our family will boycott the Oscars. If we hear of this movie winning any Oscars, we'll quit watching the Oscars altogether. We've already cut back substantially on theater and rental movies. What's next for them? Dramatic porn? It's definitely headed that way.
45 posted on 12/17/2005 3:50:32 PM PST by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
If our society is so against smoking, why isn't it ten times more against male homosexuality? A male homosexual age 20 has a life expectancy of less than 50. Smoking is much better for one's health than are the sexual activities of male homosexuals. All the health arguments made against smoking can be made in spades against male homosexual activity. Why isn't someone doing that?

Why aren't we telling our children that homosexuality is much worse for one's health than smoking?

46 posted on 12/17/2005 3:52:59 PM PST by Rum Tum Tugger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

 

 

47 posted on 12/17/2005 3:53:06 PM PST by Fintan (A recent poll found that 3 out of 4 people make up 75% of the population.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

I haven't watched or even cared about the Oscars in years. The last straw for me was when "Saving Private Ryan" lost out to "Shakespeare in Love."


48 posted on 12/17/2005 3:58:08 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Fintan
The movie theme song, Raw Hide is performed by this group


49 posted on 12/17/2005 4:02:34 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I don't know what the problem is, all the reviews say the movie is 'FABULOUS"!


50 posted on 12/17/2005 4:08:33 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

We hardly ever watch movies. Why should we open our minds to Hollyweird propaganda?


51 posted on 12/17/2005 4:51:41 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Let me give you my opinion of anal sex. Any man who passes up the finest thing God ever made in favor of an anus is probably wrong about a lot of other things too.


52 posted on 12/17/2005 5:28:43 PM PST by OldEagle (May you live long enough to hear the legends of your own adventures.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldEagle

right on, Crouton! Think I'll mosey on over and give the old man a jump, just for that.. 'night now


53 posted on 12/17/2005 8:51:16 PM PST by acapesket (never had a vote count in all my years here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I guess that's why some cowboys were their name on the back of their belt...it's so the other cowboys know who they're mating with...


54 posted on 12/17/2005 8:58:18 PM PST by Snardius (Some women want to walk hand in hand through the park; sing them a song; bite them on the spine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Census department says the number is closer to one percent.


55 posted on 12/17/2005 8:59:45 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

I tend to agree...up to a point.

My first impression after I even read this film was in preproduction was to refuse to even discuss it. Just not provide any mention of the thing.

I think the expectation by homosexuals is that there will be increased discussion about homosexuality becuase of the film, with the film as flint, or, well, "fuse" to get the public and mostly conservatives again discussing their ongoing attempts to make homosexuality the leading issue among the public of discussion, all that.

So, I hesitated to even discuss, mention this film up until about two, three days ago for that reason.

On the other hand, I've since decided that to not discuss it in very straightforward terms of declination of the title and contents, all the enthusiasm about the film from homosexuals about homosexuality in entertainment and otherwise remains the only public statement (and that should not be).

The people making the loudest and most exuberant comments and promotions of BMountain are predominantly those in the press and in cities such as New York, L.A....and, among the entertainment press, there's always a lot of excitement about homosexuality, so no surprise there (Golden Globes are awards by the Foreign Press, for example).

As an aside but an important one, to put a perspective on New York City's exuberance over this film, NYC has the highest rate of abortions nationwide, and among those, the highest rate of abortions among underage females.


56 posted on 12/18/2005 8:33:05 AM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lawgvr1955

David Geffen and Elton John will probably buy up all the tickets.


57 posted on 12/18/2005 8:36:35 AM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TwilightDog

I'm venturing to guess most of us can figure out just WHO wrote all those enthusiastic reviews.

BMountain is a film about very bad characters without ethics and morals behaving even worse. No wonder it's being enthused about by people of similar degeneracy.

There is not one shred of heroism in the film, in the characters, in the author who wrote the wretched piece from whence this film was adapted. It's just one great big "rejoicing" by similarly corrupt persons in degeneracy.

No wonder some of them are said to be crying in the theatres about it: such "beautiful" degeneracy, such "wonderful" corruption and what "great" vileness.

It's so sad.


58 posted on 12/18/2005 8:40:21 AM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rum Tum Tugger
Well, WE are telling our children that, Rum Tum, it's just a shame they don't hear that at school, instead of what is taught there.

I agree, The WHO and the MAA, APA, and every other medical organization, as well as insurance should be saying just that, loud and clear! But they don't for exactly the reason the push for hate crimes legislations were enacted and are being enacted, in the first place. Move along, no truth to see here!!
59 posted on 12/18/2005 12:58:48 PM PST by gidget7 (Get GLSEN out of our schools!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"Then they part ways, marry women who don't know their secret and have children, only to reunite four years later with a deep, fiery, longing kiss that is arguably the most passionate man-on-man kiss to have been put on screen."

Blech!! I think I need to puke!

60 posted on 12/18/2005 1:02:25 PM PST by streetpreacher (If at the end of the day, 100% of both sides are not angry with me, I've failed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson