Radio Address by the President to the Nation (A MUST READ)

The White House ^ | dec. 167 2005 | president bush

[Howlin]

Oh, you're quoting CHUCK BALDWIN, too?

Enough said.

[Choose Ye This Day]

Yes. Pat Buchanan would be so much more effective at protecting us.

< /sarcasm>

[Peach]

Are you quoting Constitution Party VP candidate Chuck Baldwin? Enough said indeed.

[57chevypreterist]

I will take you at your word that Thompson is "a documented liar" as you say (at least until I take the time to satify myself as to that evidence); but you'll have to prove to me that Baldwin falls into the same category.

[57chevypreterist]

Yes I am. Do you have any evidence that he is unreliable/untrustworthy?

[Howlin]

Chuck Baldwin is a whacko just like Lew Rockwell.

And I really don't care if you take my word about Thompson or not; you obviously knew that that article was repeatedly posted on this site and repeatedly PULLED because it's not allowed here, so you tried to sneak it in your tagline.

[Howlin]

Yes, he is.

The Bush Haters.

[ncpatriot]

If we had not gone into Iraq, the terrorists would be "housed" in Iraq and attacking Afghanistan. It would be BAD.

[Howlin]

LOL!

[Howlin]

Absolutely, as I say right here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1542363/posts?page=226#226

It helps to identify the malcontents though.

[BlackjackPershing]

Well, the FBI is using it to investigate domestic, non-terror-related crime. This should stop. This is not the intention of the Patriot Act, and should never be.

[57chevypreterist]

And I really don't care if you take my word about Thompson or not; you obviously knew that that article was repeatedly posted on this site and repeatedly PULLED because it's not allowed here, so you tried to sneak it in your tagline.

You are wrong. I did not know that the article was repeatedly posted on this site; in fact my original post # 31 was pulled by the moderator and I have sent an e-mail asking if I violated Freep's rules so that I don't do it again. This is not my site; I will respect the posted rules.

Just curious: why would it not be allowed here?

Chuck Baldwin is a whacko just like Lew Rockwell.

Now you sound like a liberal with your ad hominem attacks. Sounds to me like you can't handle REAL conservatives.

[Howlin]

Just curious: why would it not be allowed here?

Because he's a DOCUMENTED liar? Get it?

Sounds to me like you can't handle REAL conservatives.

Are you proporting to be one?

We've been "handling" the likes of you for over seven years right on this site.

"Real conservatives" don't lie.

It's pretty telling that you took Chuck Baldwiin's word about something Doug Thompson said and used it as your tagline WITHOUT CHECKING TO SEE IF IT'S TRUE.

Some "real" conservative.

[Grampa Dave]

"Shouldn't you be scouring the 'Net looking for mildly negative economic news to blow out of proportion??"

Thanks for the best laugh of the day, a miserable rainy one.

[Choose Ye This Day]

Goodbye.

Y'all don't come back now, y'hear?

[Horatio Gates]

BTTT

[Howlin]

:-)

[BigSkyFreeper]

McCain came up that abomination, but the President signed onto it.

You're being unfair to the President. McCain ATTACHED his sickening terrorist sympathizer bill to a bill providing key military funding. To veto McCain's bill would mean denying our troops the needed funding to continue in the WOT.

Shame on McCain. Because this stunt by McCain will give the Left and McCain some red meat to go after the President through the media.

Vetoing this bill will enable McCain and the leftist turds in this country to say "President Bush doesn't give a sh** about our troops".

[JerseyDvl]

Good speech indeed, the President has been fighting back like we asked for a while now. Backhanded tricks to undermine will no longer work since he is now in full control of the bully pulpit.
I am listening to the speech live now and the facts speak for themselves. There was oversight concerning this program every 45 days and NOTHING was done without NSA and WH counsel involvement as well as the AG.
Since it was secret the dummies have the "plausible deniability" which they are now exercising. It comes across as transparent and treacherous lying.

[finnman69]

NY Times reporter James Risen


If Judy Miller went to prison to protect a source over a non-crime, James Risen better be talking to his lawyers now.

This is a highly classified program that is crucial to our national security. Its purpose is to detect and prevent terrorist attacks against the United States, our friends and allies. Yesterday the existence of this secret program was revealed in media reports, after being improperly provided to news organizations. As a result, our enemies have learned information they should not have, and the unauthorized disclosure of this effort damages our national security and puts our citizens at risk. Revealing classified information is illegal, alerts our enemies, and endangers our country.