Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Creation evangelist derides evolution as ‘dumbest’ theory [Kent Hovind Alert!]
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Post ^ | 17 December 2005 | Kayla Bunge

Posted on 12/17/2005 3:58:48 AM PST by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,221-1,2401,241-1,2601,261-1,280 ... 2,121-2,129 next last
To: Junior
Of course, that upstart PatrickHenry was #1. Go figure.

It's true, I arrived at this website after you, Vade, Longshadow, and JennyP too. And Physicist, js1138, gumlegs, and probably others I can't think of at this moment. But something caused me to rise to the top of the creationist hate list. It must be that I'm so ... evolved.

1,241 posted on 12/18/2005 4:20:54 PM PST by PatrickHenry (... endless horde of misguided Luddites ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1182 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
It seems that every scientific era has its charlatans and certainly the EVO crowd has more than their share.

Can you name one yet?

1,242 posted on 12/18/2005 4:20:55 PM PST by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1240 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf
Being as the Piltdown man hoax lasted for 40 years, It was a large piece of their theory.

Some researchers recognized early on that Piltdown didn't fit. Friedrichs and Weidenreich had both, by about 1932, published their research suggesting the lower jaws and molars were that of an orang (E.A. Hooton, Up from the Ape, revised edition; The MacMillan Co., 1946).

This is what a 1946 textbook shows, several years before the claims for Piltdown were completely falsified. I could probably find an older textbook, but I think the point is made.

1,243 posted on 12/18/2005 4:23:04 PM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1236 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Upon further review ...

Billy Gilbert clearly bellows that he is "Professor Theodore von Schwartzenhoffen, MD, AD, DDS, FLD, FFF and F," and should not have to walk around.

1,244 posted on 12/18/2005 4:23:09 PM PST by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1226 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs
I believe I was thinking of something different. It starts with "Find 'em" and you probably know two more.
1,245 posted on 12/18/2005 4:25:09 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1244 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

You can start here Bozo..not that it will help.

http://www.nwcreation.net/evolutionfraud.html


1,246 posted on 12/18/2005 4:29:32 PM PST by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1242 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs
I mean, no one would have put anything off-color in an early 30s movie unless you count a split second of Marian Marsh's derriere in "Svengali" (1931).
1,247 posted on 12/18/2005 4:32:04 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1245 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
It's not easy bein' me
Master of me own destiny
And I hates responsibility
It's not easy bein' me

It's not easy bein' me
Admiral of me own ship at sea
Now I knows why I admires me
It's not easy bein' me
1,248 posted on 12/18/2005 4:32:59 PM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1241 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Not that anything about Ms. Marsh was the wrong color...
1,249 posted on 12/18/2005 4:33:17 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1247 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
Yes I saw those too. There were doubts earlier, but those sources were in an isolated minority at the time.

See britannica.com Eoanthropus dawsoni For just one of many sources.

Wolf
1,250 posted on 12/18/2005 4:35:16 PM PST by RunningWolf (Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1243 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
But something caused me to rise to the top of the creationist hate list.

Your dreaded List-O-Links and eventually your hated Ping List. Perhaps a few matters of personal hygiene.

1,251 posted on 12/18/2005 4:36:26 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1241 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Thats the best you can do isn't it my dear.

Wolf
1,252 posted on 12/18/2005 4:37:03 PM PST by RunningWolf (Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1131 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

I was in the Navy.


1,253 posted on 12/18/2005 4:39:01 PM PST by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1245 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Perhaps a few matters of personal hygiene.

Yeah, well ... there's that.

1,254 posted on 12/18/2005 4:39:52 PM PST by PatrickHenry (... endless horde of misguided Luddites ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1251 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman

"ideas have consequences."

Evolution - the idea - placed a human being behind zoo bars....consequences

Verner fancied himself a missionary but early on reconciled his former beliefs with darwinism..which he belived in fully...racist that he was.


1,255 posted on 12/18/2005 4:40:09 PM PST by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1086 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
eleni121

Google Piltdown Man and thesis or Eoanthropus dawsoni and thesis. Read the articles, follow the links. Its all there whether these galloots accept it or not.

Wolf
1,256 posted on 12/18/2005 4:41:35 PM PST by RunningWolf (Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1242 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

So, a reference to even ONE thesis on Piltdown Man? Why can't you support this claim? Why did you dishonestly tell me to support it for you when you are the one who made the claim?


1,257 posted on 12/18/2005 4:41:36 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1240 | View Replies]

To: Thatcherite

"It might be a good exercise for the lurkers to try to see whom in this thread appears to be posting while drunk. Let them form their own conclusions."

Let me guess here. Are perhaps those drunks who dissent with evolutionists views? Yes, they are. Just a rethorical question for the lurkers here.

I'd like to remind the lurkers also that the ability to retrieve from one's memory banks fancy words and ready-made phrases is not indicative of a fair and just person. These are the exact tactics of the enemy. It is also not indicative that the person is speaking the truth if they use words from their specialized field. To verify this is so, just digress them into your field of expertise or into plain old common sense and you'll find out that the road he/she was attempting to lead you was the road to self-annihilation of you religion, culture and its very essence of life.

Remember also, o lurkers, that dialects is the enemy's biggest weapon in their gradual and subtle efforts to diminish, demean, deride, debase and ultimately to enslave our people.

An example of dialects follows:

God exists(thesis) + God does NOT exist(evolutionist's Antithesis) = There is doubt as to the existence of God)(synthesis or conclusion)

Doubt on God's existence(thesis) + God does NOT exist(antithesis) = God does not exist but some skeptics remain(synthesis or conclusion)

God does not exist but some skeptics remain(thesis) + God does NOT exist = It is universally accepted that God does NOT exist(synthesis or conclusion)


1,258 posted on 12/18/2005 4:42:00 PM PST by Baraonda (Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1145 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf

So tell me, what creation scientist exposed the Piltdown hoax, and on what basis?


1,259 posted on 12/18/2005 4:43:15 PM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1256 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
There's some pretty good stuff if you know where to look, especially before the Code got teeth. For instance, in the parade celebrating Ben Hur's win in the big race, there are bare-breasted maidens strewing rose petals in front of him.

And those Warner's musicals -- "Footlight Parade" has some pretty juicy stuff in the "Honeymoon Hotel" number. The pre-code MGM Tarzan films usually have a naughty shot or two. The list goes on.

There are bits of "Animal Crackers" and "Horsefeathers" that had to be cut when they were re-released after the code that have never been recovered. In the song "Hooray for Captain Spaulding," Groucho's line "I think I'll try and make her," has been excised.

1,260 posted on 12/18/2005 4:45:41 PM PST by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1247 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,221-1,2401,241-1,2601,261-1,280 ... 2,121-2,129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson