Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fish hawk
It's not semantics, so there's no need to suggest I have a problem.

There's a definitional difference between the two words. "To accept Christ" suggests that I'm passing judgment on the Lord Of The Universe: to accept or not to accept (holding my chin in my hand, weighing the pros and cons of allowing Him into my life)? "To believe in Christ" is to trust Him to save, based on His redemptive work on the cross.

Yes?

81 posted on 12/17/2005 11:24:27 AM PST by Chunga (Mock The Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: Chunga; fish hawk
I can't help think of Carlyle's comment on the egregious bluestocking Margaret Fuller's silly pronouncement (she was always making them), "I accept the Universe."

Carlyle's acid rejoinder was, "By Gad - she'd better!"

87 posted on 12/19/2005 8:56:29 AM PST by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: Chunga
Yes?

I've always seen it as accepting Christ's grace and His lordship in your life.

Belief merely indicates that He exists. Even Satan believes in Christ. Satan knows all about Christ, yet is eternally damned.

"Accepting Christ" does not imply passing judgement on God. It's more like accepting a gift from someone--you're not passing judgement on them.

88 posted on 12/19/2005 9:04:49 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson