To: pabianice
And because offshore wind costs twice as much as gas-fired electricity and significantly more than onshore wind, the project is financially feasible only because the federal and state governments have promised $241 million in subsidies... Oops. Maybe you shouldn't have voted for subsidizing those "green" energy companies, Senator.
16 posted on
12/16/2005 8:28:25 AM PST by
Alex Murphy
(Proverbs 12:10)
To: Alex Murphy
Here in Germany the wind farms are only possible because of the tax breaks,etc. With the new government maybe this waste of time will go away. I have yet to see a singe windmill or field of windmills that improves on the view God provided!!
35 posted on
12/16/2005 9:00:44 AM PST by
lowbuck
(The Blue Card (US Passport). . . Don't leave home without it!)
To: Alex Murphy
Oops. Maybe you shouldn't have voted for subsidizing those "green" energy companies, Senator.This is RFK, Jr., not Fat Red Ted.
Incidentally, if he's against subsidizing this wind farm, maybe he's against subsidizing all companies? Is that too much to hope for?
45 posted on
12/16/2005 6:03:11 PM PST by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(I-901: A freeway funded entirely by Washington State Smoking Nazis...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson