Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alaska: Governor Set to Push Anti-Marijuana Legislation Again
Juneau Empire ^ | Dec. 9, 2005

Posted on 12/16/2005 7:23:26 AM PST by Wolfie

Governor Set to Push Anti-Marijuana Legislation Again

The Murkowski administration will "hit the ground running" next session on a bill proposed last year to overturn a court decision on marijuana use, said Alaska Department of Law spokesman Mark Morones.

Alaskans are allowed to possess up to 4 ounces of marijuana in their homes for personal use but the bill could lower that amount to less than 1 ounce if it passes.

The Senate Health, Education and Social Services Committee heard from experts last session on both sides of the issue - some arguing marijuana is a threat to society and others saying pot is less harmful than a pack of cigarettes.

The bill is awaiting action in the Senate Finance Committee before it reaches the floor. Then it would head over to the House for review.

Alaska Assistant Attorney General Dean Guaneli said some of the state's arguments were misunderstood last session. The purpose of the bill is not to bust college students smoking pot in their dorms, but to go after commercial growers, he said.

"The police are not getting effective search warrants for marijuana growing operations," Guaneli said.

Even though officers can smell marijuana coming from a residence, it is not enough evidence to prove there is more than the 4 ounces needed to get a search warrant, he said.

Those possessing more than 4 ounces would be charged with a Class C felony and those with an ounce would be charged with a Class A misdemeanor, according to the bill.

Michael Macleod-Ball, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Alaska, said the bill does not increase penalties for those growing commercial marijuana.

"Criminalizing those with small amounts of marijuana does not solve the problem," he said.

The bill also tampers with a right to privacy ruling that is unique to Alaska, Macleod-Ball said.

"All it does is give the police the ability to go into someone's home if they believe they have marijuana," he said.

A landmark court decision by the Alaska Supreme Court in 1975 made small amounts of marijuana kept at home by adults legal. It found no relationship between private use of the drug and the public welfare.

Experts who phoned in to the Senate committee meetings last session tried to show that in some cases smoking marijuana could lead to violence.

"If I smoke marijuana, I may not be led to rob a store. But I can lose my job and then be motivated to steal," John Fielder, a clinical psychologist at St. Mary's Medical Hospital in San Francisco, told the Senate committee last session.

The bill hearings are a platform to get testimony on the record so that if the bill passes, the findings can be used in court, Guaneli said.

The state will charge someone for possession of marijuana if the bill passes and use the suspect's trial to introduce the findings in the bill, he said. The judge may or may not use the findings to make his decision to overturn the long-standing ruling, Guaneli said.

The state wants to prevent marijuana from getting into the hands of children by going after local growers; if authorities can take out about half of the producers, then kids would be priced out of the market, Guaneli said.

The bill, Senate Bill 74, was bogged down last year because it was introduced in the middle of the session and needed extra time to get through the testimonies, Guaneli said.

Bills proposed last session that did not reach the House and Senate floors for a final vote are still alive because bills introduced in the two-year session remain on the table through 2006.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: aclu; bongbrigade; chemicalwarfare; donutwatch; govwatch; hahadopers; liberals; liberaltarians; murkowski; perverts; waronterror; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
It appears the Governor is unaware of how a State Constitution works.
1 posted on 12/16/2005 7:23:28 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

"It appears the Governor is unaware of how a State Constitution works."

It's just a damn piece of paper right?


2 posted on 12/16/2005 7:26:51 AM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
"If I smoke marijuana, I may not be led to rob a store. But I can lose my job and then be motivated to steal,"

If there was a Nobel Prize for Sophistry, this gentleman's statement should certainly place him in consideration.

What a shameless, bought-and-paid-for, lickspittle!

It's hard to believe that a gubmint pension can be that enticing.

3 posted on 12/16/2005 7:36:14 AM PST by headsonpikes (The Liberal Party of Canada are not b*stards - b*stards have mothers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

The state wants to prevent marijuana from getting into the hands of children by going after local growers; if authorities can take out about half of the producers, then kids would be priced out of the market, Guaneli said.
-----
Now who is this kind of thinking serving? MJ users, of course. If it is so bad, then BAN IT ALL TOGETHER!!! Their thinking is "don't throw quite so much gasoline on the fire".


4 posted on 12/16/2005 7:37:49 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes

The guy was probably hired by some government agency right out of college and has never done an honest days work in his life. That's the problem with land use planners also.


5 posted on 12/16/2005 7:41:02 AM PST by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PaxMacian; WindMinstrel; philman_36; headsonpikes; cryptical; vikzilla; libertyman; Quick1; ...

ping


6 posted on 12/16/2005 7:41:49 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
"If I smoke marijuana, I may not be led to rob a store. But I can lose my job and then be motivated to steal," John Fielder, a clinical psychologist at St. Mary's Medical Hospital in San Francisco, told the Senate committee last session.

Well, if I like to read books, I may not be led to rob a store. But if I just read all day and don't go to work,I can lose my job and then be motivated to steal. That line of thinking works for anything. You do anything too much it will cause problems. I didn't think reasonable people still thought pot was a evil scourge or that it worse than alcohol.
7 posted on 12/16/2005 7:42:37 AM PST by RambozoDClown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Frankie needs to show an iron fist on this one. Just ban it all!


8 posted on 12/16/2005 7:45:02 AM PST by MassachusettsGOP (Massachusetts Republican....A rare breed indeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
If there was a Nobel Prize for Sophistry, this gentleman's statement should certainly place him in consideration.

The statement is hyperbole, but it does reflect the fact that overall the greatest harmful consequence of a person using marijuana is getting arrested for it, and the consequences that follow from that.

9 posted on 12/16/2005 7:59:22 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
"If I smoke marijuana, I may not be led to rob a store. But I can lose my job and then be motivated to steal

and then go out and order a pizza with the works, eat a few twinkies, drink a milk shake and eat some french fries.

10 posted on 12/16/2005 8:03:59 AM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
That was not what he was saying - he was quoted following this:Experts who phoned in to the Senate committee meetings last session tried to show that in some cases smoking marijuana could lead to violence.

I assume the unstated implication in the good psychologist's statement has something to do with amotivational syndrome, or some other attribute of pot that causes job loss.

Faulty metaphysics, essentially. ;^).

11 posted on 12/16/2005 8:36:04 AM PST by headsonpikes (The Liberal Party of Canada are not b*stards - b*stards have mothers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Control freaks! Nothing but control freaks!
Where are the criminal statistics? Is Alaska a hell hole of crime and depravity because people can have four ounces of marijuana in their home?

Will I hear crickets from the naysayers?

12 posted on 12/16/2005 8:40:57 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philman_36; headsonpikes

This legislation is a monumental waste of time. The only thing that can accomplish what the Governor wants is a Constitutional amendment.


13 posted on 12/16/2005 8:45:56 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
BAN IT ALL TOGETHER!!!

State Constitution be damned?

14 posted on 12/16/2005 7:16:51 PM PST by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Americanwolf; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
15 posted on 12/16/2005 10:32:48 PM PST by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
It appears the Governor is unaware of how a State Constitution works.

Yeah! He thinks legislators should make laws instead of judges.

16 posted on 12/16/2005 10:38:27 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Sure thing. The Legislature should be able to crap all over the Constitution. No naysayers allowed.


17 posted on 12/17/2005 9:02:19 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
crap all over the Constitution.

"A landmark court decision by the Alaska Supreme Court in 1975 made small amounts of marijuana kept at home by adults legal."

You should have read the article before embarrassing yourself.

18 posted on 12/17/2005 9:07:06 AM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Someone outside Alaska is obviously bankrolling this scheme. Why else doggedly pursue this political dead horse?
There is more "passion" on this issue than even education, roads, or health.


19 posted on 12/17/2005 9:19:17 AM PST by rasblue (Everyone has their price)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
Please. The Court decided the Legislature passed an un-Constitutional law. The Legislature can seek recourse by amending the State Constitution. That's how our form of government works. Apparently you are unaware of that. How embarassing for you.
20 posted on 12/17/2005 9:22:52 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson