Do journalists do journalism anymore? The second half of that sentence is incompatible with the first.
The word they left out is earmark. An earmark is a technical term. Earmarking allows the full funding to be allocated to a project at once. Since earmarking was removed but the funding was not, only $100 million can be allocated to each project this fiscal year. I do not know why some journalists leave out the technicalities when our society is nearly 100% technical to begin with. We know tech; we do tech; it's journalists who have a problem with tech, isn't it?