Skip to comments.
Archaeologists Unearth a War Zone 5,500 Years Old
NY Times ^
| December 16, 2005
| JOHN NOBLE WILFORD
Posted on 12/16/2005 2:51:40 AM PST by Pharmboy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
Whatta find...
1
posted on
12/16/2005 2:51:43 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
To: SunkenCiv
2
posted on
12/16/2005 2:52:10 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
(The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
To: Pharmboy
the oldest known excavated site of large-scale organized warfareI don't see the torture rooms.
3
posted on
12/16/2005 2:55:58 AM PST
by
beyond the sea
(Murtha: Redeployment - What .......Surrender? // “Victory is not a strategy”)
To: Pharmboy
Have muslim shiites been around that long?
Did they find any IEDs?
4
posted on
12/16/2005 2:56:43 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
To: Pharmboy
John Kerry remembers it like it was yesterday - it's seared into his mind.
To: Pharmboy
The residents had a heck of an exit strategy, i'm sure
To: Pharmboy
It was previously thought that the culture had spread north through colonization, trade or conquest. The new research revealed that relations between north and south were not without major conflict.
It is surprising, though not unexpected, that in this part of the world with the biological deficients we know exist there, that the concept of "conquest" is not considered a "major conflict"
Or is this more of that elusive muslim humor?
7
posted on
12/16/2005 3:01:06 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
To: Pharmboy
The location is said to be the oldest known excavated site of a large battle.Beware of duds. They can ruin the rest of your life,when they go off unexpectedly.
8
posted on
12/16/2005 3:04:41 AM PST
by
Fraxinus
To: Pharmboy
NYTimes is the source, are you sure they didn't fabricate parts of this story? hehehehe.
--Finding a 5,500 year old warzone is going to devastate the peace lovers.
9
posted on
12/16/2005 3:10:10 AM PST
by
1FASTGLOCK45
(FreeRepublic: More fun than watching Dem'Rats drown like Turkeys in the rain! ! !)
To: Pharmboy
archaeologists have uncovered what they say is substantial evidence of a fierce battle fought there in about 3500 B.C. Hmmmp! I had no idea Bush was that old.
10
posted on
12/16/2005 3:14:52 AM PST
by
libertylover
(Abortion is a crime against humanity.)
To: Pharmboy
"Only the dead have seen the last of war"
To: Hardastarboard
Great quote, and how appropriate for this thread. Plato said it, for those interested.
12
posted on
12/16/2005 3:32:32 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
(The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
To: Pharmboy
Uruk, also known as the biblical city of Erech.
13
posted on
12/16/2005 3:35:20 AM PST
by
familyop
To: familyop
Thanks for the info. Where in the bible is that city mentioned and was anything significant said about it? Also, was it in "The Fertile Crescent?" It seems to be near there based on the description...(Syria/Iraq border).
14
posted on
12/16/2005 3:39:33 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
(The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
To: 1FASTGLOCK45
Finding a 5,500 year old warzone is going to devastate the peace lovers
This shows that there may have been peace lovers for as long as 5,500 years.
Warfare is a natural state of affairs Im hard pressed to think of a truly peaceful group of animals in nature. From humans to apes to dog and cats and ants they protect their territory and conquer their neighbors. I even watch the local squirrels at war on a regular basis.
15
posted on
12/16/2005 3:43:41 AM PST
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: Pharmboy
I don't remember where it is in the Bible, offhand, and will have to look again. From a quick search, Gilgamesh didn't reign for 800-900 years after the dating of the posted dig. Abraham didn't come along for about 1500 years (~ year 2000, if the searched info is correct). The dig mentioned might possibly have been one of the first Sumerian cities.
16
posted on
12/16/2005 4:04:40 AM PST
by
familyop
To: familyop
Thanks for the follow-up. Any further Biblical references you find to this area would be interesting to many who read this thread.
17
posted on
12/16/2005 4:07:18 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
(The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
To: Pharmboy
Here it is. It speaks of Nimrod.
Bereshit (Genesis) 10:10 (Tanakh,
Jewish Virtual Library)
"
And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar."
18
posted on
12/16/2005 4:11:32 AM PST
by
familyop
To: Pharmboy
...10:9-11 for minimum context--10:1-11 for more. It appears that Nimrod might have been a grandson of Noah, if I'm reading it correctly. Nimrod, a disobedient tyrant, probably reigned a little over 3700 years ago, long after the estimated date of items in the current archeological dig.
19
posted on
12/16/2005 4:26:54 AM PST
by
familyop
To: R. Scott
Warfare is a natural state of affairs Im hard pressed to think of a truly peaceful group of animals in nature. From humans to apes to dog and cats and ants they protect their territory and conquer their neighbors. I even watch the local squirrels at war on a regular basis Your assessment may be correct. Other animals go to war only over access to resources. Do humans go to war for any other reasons?
20
posted on
12/16/2005 4:27:30 AM PST
by
Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit
("A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both." - Dwight D. Eisenhower)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson