Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: burzum
To build on your theory, which is one I am also familiar with, if you buy into natural selection at all, it would also make sense that in the lighter, more colorless climate of the north, that a camouflage effect would be useful among a nomadic people, in much the same way as it benefits animals. It might not play as much of a role, but worth consideration nonetheless.

No matter; I've always believed that blackness or whiteness, as a genetic component, was environmentally functional. As an aesthetic component, I think our creative God just loves variety. Imagine if flowers and birds were only one color.

193 posted on 12/17/2005 7:00:03 AM PST by sweetliberty (Stupidity should make you sterile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: sweetliberty
I am also familiar with, if you buy into natural selection at all, it would also make sense that in the lighter, more colorless climate of the north, that a camouflage effect would be useful among a nomadic people, in much the same way as it benefits animals.

Only if you are running around in all of that snow and ice naked. (See post #171, above)

194 posted on 12/17/2005 8:07:20 AM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson