Let's hope it won't take the loss of one of our cities to propel us into action.
Bush is a student of history, and as such he acts in ways that are historical. He gives little thought to the way he is treated in contemporary assessments. While he makes many accomodations to political reality, for the most part he strives for transformational policy thrusts. For those reasons, I believe if we need to do something re: Iran, Bush is the one to do it.
The thing is, large-scale military action against Iran might induce our domestic moonbats to extreme lengths. I'm serious--they're enraged and powerless and desperate, and hate our country. Who knows how they'll react. We live in one of the critical crossroads of history.
I believe Bush is president at this time in our history because we need a strong leader. We'll see if he continues to look out for the United States. A democratic president would hand us lock stock and barrel over to the UN to decide what happens to us.
The thing is, large-scale military action against Iran might induce our domestic moonbats to extreme lengths. I'm serious--they're enraged and powerless and desperate, and hate our country. Who knows how they'll react. We live in one of the critical crossroads of history.
If push comes to shove with Iran, I don't think they'll be much of a problem. The 2nd admendment is the best of all. :-)
I'm serious--they're enraged and powerless and desperate, and hate our country. Who knows how they'll react.
to quote my favorite President : "Bring it on!"