Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Servant of the 9
Before monotheism, man attacked man in self defense or to gain resources, not from pure spite hatred and bloodymindedness.

You're kidding, right?

From the earliest days of polytheistic civilization in the Middle East up to Caesar's conquest of Gaul, vicious massacres were the order of the day, mitigated occasionally by the practice of slavery.

87 posted on 12/15/2005 10:56:41 AM PST by denydenydeny ("As a Muslim of course I am a terrorist"--Sheikh Omar Brooks, quoted in the London Times 8/7/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: denydenydeny
Before monotheism, man attacked man in self defense or to gain resources, not from pure spite hatred and bloodymindedness.

You're kidding, right?

From the earliest days of polytheistic civilization in the Middle East up to Caesar's conquest of Gaul, vicious massacres were the order of the day, mitigated occasionally by the practice of slavery.

And as I said they did it either in self defense or for material gain, not because they couldn't mind their own businesses and leave other peoples thoughts alone.

So9

89 posted on 12/15/2005 11:01:56 AM PST by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson