You wrote: "I have no alternative scientific theory, but I do have belief. I am here because of that belief, and to learn from both sides."
Reply:
Is there an "American Judeo-Christian" verity about these questions? Not at all. Muslims devoted to the Qu'ran equally reject evolution. The preference for faith-based government, and missionarism for one particular view, crosses all boundaries. In all times, priests/pastors/mullahs/monks have tried to capture the power of government to promote their own agendas.
But the issue about 'intelligent design' is not just a matter of personal belief. It is a question of public policy. Is 'intelligent design' a good idea to promote? Or does it repress scientific, human inquiry? I recently tutored a student in chemistry, and there are complex ideas about molecular orbitals, but I think the important point is that there are complex ideas, and we can't ignore them by saying "God did it."
Personal belief in astrology is neither a good basis for international relations nor for family finances. Public displays of religiosity/piety are about power, not about spiritualness or social responsibility.
Personal beliefs and good public policy are not the same.
*************
I don't believe (that pesky word again) that ID or Creationism must or should repress scientific inquiry. It appears that this is a concern of the scientific community, which seems based at least in part on historical events.
"God did it". Yes, God did. That doesn't mean that we should be intellectually lazy or dishonest, imho. God also gave us brains, which means to me that He intends us to use them.
Repression is not my goal,of either the scientific or religious communities.