Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

88 posted on 12/19/2005 9:02:58 AM PST by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nutmeg
Now Congress wants to outlaw these methods — said to have yielded valuable intelligence — by passing a prohibition on "cruel, inhumane or degrading" treatment. Even the "enhanced" techniques employed at Gitmo may not survive. The McCain amendment may make sense as a public relations move to counter a tidal wave of negative publicity. But it could lead to an anomalous result: a system that treats captured terrorists better than we treat our own soldiers.

I positively can't stand McCain. His liberal proposals like his Campaign Finance Reform serve to undermine the Bush administration and to gain favor with the left and our critics overseas. Torture is illegal in America, we already know that, but what the McCain amendment will do is to stop the use of coercive interrogation tactics to extract vital information. This “torture” ban will give terrorists like Al-Qaeda the right to convince the courts to interfere with the conduct of the war on terror. Imagine if a terrorist is caught, and and he and other terrorists plan to carry out another attack like 9/11, the McCain ban will allow the attack to take place, since the only one caught wouldn't willingly provide any information.

89 posted on 12/19/2005 11:49:06 AM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson