They are exactly the point - you claim that these stickers call for an examination of some presumed inadequacies in the theory, and yet when questioned about said inadequacies, suddenly there's the sound of crickets. You'll have to excuse me if I, in turn, presume that these supposed inadequacies are merely a fig leaf to cloud some deeper purpose behind the stickers. Feel free to disabuse me by citing one or two difficulties, however.
Actually, that's not what I said, but it's immaterial in any case. The point is that there is debate about evolution, as there ought to be, as there ought to be debate about everything that's not religious dogma.
I, in turn, presume that these supposed inadequacies are merely a fig leaf to cloud some deeper purpose behind the stickers.
Hey, feel free to presume all you want. It's a free country. I certainly wouldn't be so mind-bogglingly foolish as to claim that it's unconstitutional for you to express your opinion.
Feel free to disabuse me by citing one or two difficulties, however.
I already have. Again, not that it matters to the question of whether the stickers are unconstitutional.