Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wal-Mart Fires Manager Who Called Police On Black Customer
The Ksbwchannel ^ | 12/14/2005 | cawats

Posted on 12/14/2005 11:43:43 AM PST by CAWats

TAMPA, Fla. -- A Tampa-area Wal-Mart manager who called sheriff's deputies to apprehend a black businessman over a check he found questionable was fired for using "poor judgment," but did not engage in racial profiling, the retail chain said Tuesday.

An internal investigation of the Nov. 23 incident at a Wal-Mart supercenter in Brandon found that the manager, Mark Cornett, violated company procedures when he called the law on Reginald Pitts who presented a $13,600 check to pay for holiday gift cards for his company's employees, a Wal-Mart spokeswoman said.

(Excerpt) Read more at theksbwchannel.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: blackcustomer; fired; merrychristmasmark; midmanagementweenies; police; walmart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-206 last
To: F.J. Mitchell
Wasn't anything false about it.
201 posted on 12/14/2005 9:36:40 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

I respectfully disagree.


202 posted on 12/15/2005 6:52:53 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Okay, bring our troops home. But don't feign surprise when the terrorists tag along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Fruitbat

Yes, I think everybody deserves the benefit of the doubt.


203 posted on 12/15/2005 7:29:13 AM PST by Unassuaged (I have shocking data relevant to the conversation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Unassuaged
Yes, I think everybody deserves the benefit of the doubt.

I disagree. Some don't. All things need to be considered. But in an example with limited information and no further insights, for purposes of discussion, that's fair.

Tookie Williams didn't deserve any benefits-of-the-doubt. Neither does Saddam Hussein. Nor do others depending upon what those doubts are and what the possible consequences of those extending such doubts would be.

204 posted on 12/15/2005 8:36:20 AM PST by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Unassuaged

To clarify that last one, let's assume a three-time child molester is up for parole after 10 years and says he's clean now. That person should not be extended any benefit of the doubt. The results/consequences of doing so can easily be, and likely will be, the destruction of more lives.


205 posted on 12/15/2005 8:37:59 AM PST by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Fruitbat

I also agree that if there is no doubt, there should be swift consequences.


206 posted on 12/15/2005 9:44:25 AM PST by Unassuaged (I have shocking data relevant to the conversation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-206 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson