Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. trade deficit reaches record high
The Centre Daily Times ^ | Wed, Dec. 14, 2005 | MARTIN CRUTSINGER -- Associated Press

Posted on 12/14/2005 9:35:14 AM PST by Willie Green

For education and discussion only. Not for commercial use.

WASHINGTON - The U.S. trade deficit unexpectedly rose to an all-time high in October as oil shipments soared and the United States set deficit records with China, Europe, Canada and Mexico.

The Commerce Department reported that the gap between what America sells overseas and what it imports rose by 4.4 percent in October to $68.9 billion, surpassing the old record of $66 billion set in September.

So far this year, the trade deficit is running at an annual rate of $718 billion, far surpassing last year's $617.6 billion imbalance. Critics say the soaring deficit is evidence that President Bush's policy of pursuing free trade deals around the world is not working.

To counter the attacks, the administration has stepped up pressure on Europe and Japan to boost economic growth as a way of increasing demand for U.S. exports. It is also pressuring China on a number of trade issues, from textile imports to the country's currency, which American manufacturers say is being manipulated to give Chinese producers unfair trade advantages.

But lawmakers from both parties criticized the administration's approach as too tentative, saying the new deficit figure highlighted the threat to American jobs.

"Small business owners in Maine and across the nation are fighting to remain competitive with countries such as China that flagrantly disregard fair trade practices," Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, said in a statement.

Rep. Benjamin Cardin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the House Ways and Means trade subcommittee, said the administration had "failed to craft an effective strategy to deal with China's unfair trading practices."

Presidential spokesman Scott McClellan told reporters at the White House that the administration believed the best approach was to tear down barriers to American exports through free trade agreements and global trade negotiations under way this week in Hong Kong.

The deterioration of the deficit in October caught analysts by surprise. They had been forecasting that the imbalance would improve, reflecting a fall in global oil prices.

The average price per barrel of imported oil did decline slightly to $56.29, down from an average of $57.32 in September, but the volume of shipments shot up to 9.8 million barrels per day. The total bill for imports in October hit a record of $25.8 billion, up 7.8 percent from September.

A surge of Chinese shipments of televisions, toys and computers pushed America's deficit with China to a new monthly record of $20.5 billion. Through October, the deficit with China is running at an annual rate of $200 billion, far exceeding last year's imbalance of $162 billion, which had been the biggest deficit ever recorded with a single country.

On recent trips to China, both Bush and Treasury Secretary John Snow have lobbied Chinese officials to provide greater flexibility for their currency, the yuan, to find its proper value in relation to the U.S. dollar. American manufacturers contend that the Chinese are artificially depressing the yuan's value by as much as 40 percent as a way to make Chinese goods cheaper in relation to U.S. products.

While the Chinese did allow the yuan to rise by 2.1 percent this past summer, the currency has been essentially unchanged since that time.

The administration did reach an agreement recently to re-impose quotas on a wide range of clothing and textile products to stem what had been a flood of imports this year since global quotas were lifted last January. For October, imports of Chinese clothing and textiles declined by 10.9 percent from September but for the first 10 months of this year, Chinese imports are up by 47.6 percent compared to the same period in 2004.

For October, imports of goods and services rose by 2.7 percent to an all-time high of $176.4 billion, led by the surge in oil shipments. U.S. exports also rose by a slower 1.7 percent to $107.5 billion.

Critics blame the soaring trade deficits for a loss of 3 million manufacturing jobs since mid-2000 and they argue that Bush's push to strike free trade agreements eliminating all trade barriers between the United States and other nations has opened American workers to unfair competition from low-wage countries.

The United States set deficit records with most of its major trading partners including a $12.1 billion imbalance with the 25-nation European Union, a $8.1 billion imbalance with Canada, the country's largest trading partner, and a record $4.8 billion deficit with Mexico.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: buchananites; corporatism; depression; despair; doom; dustbowl; eeyore; globalism; haha; joebtfsplk; patsboys; presidentbuchanan; thebusheconomy; tradedeficit; weregonnadie; willielogic; zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last
To: remember
What I said was that economic growth was "not better than every year from 1896 to 1970".

Strange, what I thought you said was "in terms of growth, every year from 1976 to now was obviously not better than every year from 1896 to 1970."  This is why I just pointed out that not every year was not better, and that in fact some were not worse, but evidently what I thought you said was clearly not what you meant that I heard you tell me to listen to your informing me otherwise.

I think.

"...it's far more plausible that we are better off because of advances in technology, not because of our record-setting trade deficit."

Now that we can agree on.  So the next time someone asks if trade deficits are good or bad, we can both say together "it depends..".

cheers!

61 posted on 12/23/2005 10:13:01 AM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
establishing trade barriers on imports,

Raise prices domestically

reducing the exchange rate (termed devaluation) such that exports are less expensive and imports more expensive,

Stifle our economy as the greatest in the world.

or invading foreign countries with sizable armies.

Whatever it takes to support a sovereign nation with the greatest economy, brightest future, and toting innovation envious of the rest of the world.

62 posted on 12/23/2005 10:22:58 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson