[cornelis]

This farmer looks pretty a strong. He noticed that chaos is scientifically acceptable, design is not.

He noticed the farce in declaring oneself the final arbiter

He noticed that scientists are human beings. He noticed it quite beautifully: You don't know what you're talking about. The professor sat in my very living room, told that very story, and confirmed that personal prejudice, politics, and totally irrational impulses sometimes not only influence--BUT GOVERN--the scientific community. He said something very startling. Listen to this: SCIENTISTS ARE HUMAN BEINGS.

He noticed that sever limitations of a limited science: poetry, religion, architecture, all dancing about on an exquisitely blue pea-sized globe in a universal ether that is characterized by vast stretches of pure void--that doesn't happen without a creator, boys.

He noticed the semantic juggling: Well, of course! "We" call it an accident, a mutation--and violate the very foundation of science itself, that the universe behaves according to observable and recordable, (albeit complex) laws.

Fine show.

[Virginia-American]

He noticed the semantic juggling: Well, of course! "We" call it an accident, a mutation--and violate the very foundation of science itself, that the universe behaves according to observable and recordable, (albeit complex) laws.

It's "semantic juggling" to call a copying error an accident? and then claim that the existence of mutations "violate the very foundation of science itself", and somehow goes against "the universe behaves according to observable and recordable, (albeit complex) laws." ?!

[CarolinaGuitarman]

" He noticed the farce in declaring oneself the final arbiter."

But I never said I was the final arbiter (That's me who you are referring to there). The farce was his making that up. :) The farce was his calling me a liar and then running away when asked to back it up. The farce is you defending him. :)

[Dimensio]

He noticed that evolution postulates that donkeys give birth to jay birds. The fact that he is completely wrong on that is apparently of no consequence. He also noticed that we will call him out when he makes unsupported vague claims of a "professor friend" who "fully disputed evolution" while utterly refusing to provide any details regarding his "friend" beyond that, including the field of this "professor's" doctorate or a sample of this "professor's" arguments apart from an appeal to incredulity (a logical fallacy).

[hosepipe]

[ He noticed that scientists are human beings. He noticed it quite beautifully: You don't know what you're talking about. The professor sat in my very living room, told that very story, and confirmed that personal prejudice, politics, and totally irrational impulses sometimes not only influence--BUT GOVERN--the scientific community. He said something very startling. Listen to this: SCIENTISTS ARE HUMAN BEINGS. ]

No,NO,NO.. thats the against the law to talk that plainly and straight forward.. HANDS TO FACE.. {faux faint} hit the ground, get back up throw dirt on myself, tear my clothing..

Pretty soon some might advance the possiblity some scientists might be stone hard core leftists.. DE-God'ing the United States like God was tobacco and churchs were packs of cigarettes.. I NEVER...