To: PatrickHenry
I know I've mentioned this before, but it still astounds me that supposedly "conservative" religious types don't see the inherent danger in encouraging the government to take up the business of teaching religious doctrine.
14 posted on
12/14/2005 6:55:09 AM PST by
Chiapet
(Two eyebrows are always better than one.)
To: Chiapet
I disagree. I think they want it.
18 posted on
12/14/2005 7:00:29 AM PST by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Chiapet
I know I've mentioned this before, but it still astounds me that supposedly "conservative" religious types don't see the inherent danger in encouraging the government to take up the business of teaching religious doctrine.
Nonsense. John Hancock paid for Cotton Mather written primers for school children in New England. Texas schools had orthodox Bible studies as late as the 1940s and 1950s. You would prefer the moral compass of a teacher who claims gorillas in the family tree?
20 posted on
12/14/2005 7:04:23 AM PST by
farmer18th
("The fool says in his heart there is no God.")
To: Chiapet
I know I've mentioned this before, but it still astounds me that supposedly "conservative" religious types don't see the inherent danger in encouraging the government to take up the business of teaching religious doctrine. ( Chiapet)
Since government schools can not be politically, culturally, or religiously neutral in content or consequences, they MUST be abolished.
They are are a insult to freedom of conscience.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson